Many startling revelations here; and let us also note that Wilkerson, 
a Republican, regards his
party as defunct, thanks to Bush/Cheney. It is a GOP attractive only 
to some 21%--a fringe
group of the nation's "cranks, reprobates and loonies," as he puts it.

I'd say that nails it. So let's now ask about the other party and its 
leader: WHY do they continue
to refrain from prosecuting Cheney, and WHY do they keep on appeasing 
the Republicans?

Obama cannot keep this up forever, I don't care how popular he is 
right now, or what a
gifted orator he is.

MCM

The Truth About Richard Bruce Cheney
Wednesday, May 13 2009, 5:32PM

This is a guest post exclusive to The Washington Note by Col. 
Lawrence B. Wilkerson, who is former chief of staff of the Department 
of State during the term of Secretary of State Colin Powell. Lawrence 
Wilkerson is also Pamela Harriman Visiting Professor at the College 
of William & Mary.

http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/2009/05/

Last night I was on Rachel Maddow's show on MSNBC at the top of the 
hour. But before I came on, through the earpiece I listened to the 
five minutes that Rachel sketched as a lead-in. Most of it was 
videotape from the last few days of former Vice President Dick Cheney 
extolling the virtues of harsh interrogation, torture, and his 
leadership. I had heard some of it earlier of course but not all of 
it and not in such a tightly-packed package.

Let's just say that five minutes of the Sith Lord was stunningly inaccurate.

So, when I got home last night, I thought long and hard about what I 
knew at this point in my investigations with respect to the former 
VP's office. Here it is.

First, more Americans were killed by terrorists on Cheney's watch 
than on any other leader's watch in US history. So his constant claim 
that no Americans were killed in the "seven and a half years" after 
9/11 of his vice presidency takes on a new texture when one considers 
that fact. And it is a fact.

There was absolutely no policy priority attributed to al-Qa'ida by 
the Cheney-Bush administration in the months before 9/11. 
Counterterrorism czar Dick Clarke's position was downgraded, 
al-Qa'ida was put in the background so as to emphasize Iraq, and the 
policy priorities were lowering taxes, abrogating the ABM Treaty and 
building ballistic missile defenses.

Second, the fact no attack has occurred on U.S. soil since 9/11--much 
touted by Cheney--is due almost entirely to the nation's having 
deployed over 200,000 U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan and not to 
"the Cheney method of interrogation."

Those troops have kept al-Qa'ida at bay, killed many of them, and 
certainly "fixed" them, as we say in military jargon. Plus, sadly 
enough, those 200,000 troops present a far more lucrative and close 
proximity target for al-Qa'ida than the United States homeland. 
Testimony to that fact is clear: almost 5,000 American troops have 
died, more Americans than died on 9/11. Of course, they are the type 
of Americans for whom Cheney hasn't much use as he declared rather 
dramatically when he achieved no less than five draft deferments 
during the Vietnam War.

Third--and here comes the blistering fact--when Cheney claims that if 
President Obama stops "the Cheney method of interrogation and 
torture", the nation will be in danger, he is perverting the facts 
once again. But in a very ironic way.

My investigations have revealed to me--vividly and clearly--that once 
the Abu Ghraib photographs were made public in the Spring of 2004, 
the CIA, its contractors, and everyone else involved in administering 
"the Cheney methods of interrogation", simply shut down. Nada. 
Nothing. No torture or harsh techniques were employed by any U.S. 
interrogator. Period. People were too frightened by what might happen 
to them if they continued.

What I am saying is that no torture or harsh interrogation techniques 
were employed by any U.S. interrogator for the entire second term of 
Cheney-Bush, 2005-2009. So, if we are to believe the protestations of 
Dick Cheney, that Obama's having shut down the "Cheney interrogation 
methods" will endanger the nation, what are we to say to Dick Cheney 
for having endangered the nation for the last four years of his vice 
presidency?

Likewise, what I have learned is that as the administration 
authorized harsh interrogation in April and May of 2002--well before 
the Justice Department had rendered any legal opinion--its principal 
priority for intelligence was not aimed at pre-empting another 
terrorist attack on the U.S. but discovering a smoking gun linking 
Iraq and al-Qa'ida.

So furious was this effort that on one particular detainee, even when 
the interrogation team had reported to Cheney's office that their 
detainee "was compliant" (meaning the team recommended no more 
torture), the VP's office ordered them to continue the enhanced 
methods. The detainee had not revealed any al-Qa'ida-Baghdad contacts 
yet. This ceased only after Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi, under 
waterboarding in Egypt, "revealed" such contacts. Of course later we 
learned that al-Libi revealed these contacts only to get the torture 
to stop.

There in fact were no such contacts. (Incidentally, al-Libi just 
"committed suicide" in Libya. Interestingly, several U.S. lawyers 
working with tortured detainees were attempting to get the Libyan 
government to allow them to interview al-Libi....)

Less important but still busting my chops as a Republican, is the 
damage that the Sith Lord Cheney is doing to my political party.

He and Rush Limbaugh seem to be its leaders now. Lindsay Graham, John 
McCain, John Boehner, and all other Republicans of note seem to be 
either so enamored of Cheney-Limbaugh (or fearful of them?) or, on 
the other hand, so appalled by them, that the cat has their tongues. 
And meanwhile fewer Americans identify as Republicans than at any 
time since WWII. We're at 21% and falling--right in line with the 
number of cranks, reprobates, and loonies in the country.

When will we hear from those in my party who give a damn about their 
country and about the party of Lincoln?

When will someone of stature tell Dick Cheney that enough is enough? 
Go home. Spend your 70 million. Luxuriate in your Eastern Shore 
mansion. Shoot quail with your friends--and your friends.

Stay out of our way as we try to repair the extensive damage you've 
done--to the country and to its Republican Party.

-- Lawrence Wilkerson
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's 
"News From Underground" newsgroup.

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
[email protected] OR go to 
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the 
"Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the 
page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. 

For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to