My analysis of the proposals was that going forward a .org like E-Democracy
could not afford the legal risk of hosting under generated content via
online groups on a non-commercial platform and still serve Europeans. We
could move to Facebook or some other .com and let them be liable I suppose.

Is that a reasonable analysis?

Steven Clift

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Dave Farber <far...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 5, 2018, 8:32 AM
Subject: [IP] European Parliament votes to block copyright reform
To: ip <i...@listbox.com>





Begin forwarded message:

*From:* Richard Forno <rfo...@infowarrior.org>
*Date:* July 5, 2018 at 9:09:48 PM GMT+9
*To:* Infowarrior List <infowarr...@attrition.org>
*Cc:* Dave Farber <d...@farber.net>
*Subject:* *European Parliament votes to block copyright reform*

European Parliament votes to block copyright reform

Google, Facebook and other big firms argued that the text would stifle
creativity and content-sharing online.

By Joanna Plucinska

7/5/18, 12:15 PM CET

Updated 7/5/18, 1:49 PM CET

https://www.politico.eu/article/european-parliament-votes-to-block-copyright-reform/

The European Parliament voted Thursday to reject a sweeping reform of
copyright rules for the internet age, reopening debate on a controversial
bill that sets Big Tech against publishers and media companies.

The rejected bill, which aimed to beef up enforcement of copyright rules
online, will now be sent back to Parliament for further discussion, and all
751 European lawmakers will be able to submit fresh amendments to the text.

After nearly two years of debate, the rare move to reject a bill already
approved by a Parliament committee — usually enough to send the bill on —
showed just how much was at stake.

If passed in their current form, the new rules would have forced companies
like Google and Facebook to monitor their platforms much more closely for
copyright infringements, and hand more power to license-holders ranging
from publishers to media companies and record labels.

The rejection marks a defeat for the latter group, which had hoped that
tougher copyright rules would strengthen their hand in negotiations with
the platforms, wring more revenue from online content and empower creatives
online.

Both sides waged fierce lobbying campaigns in the days ahead of the vote.

Former Beatle Paul McCartney weighed in this week with an impassioned
letter defending the reform, while the other side roped in British comedian
Stephen Fry as well as hiring vehicles to drive around Brussels warning
about dire consequences for internet freedom if the reform passed in its
current form.

The anti-copyright campaign argued that tougher enforcement of copyright
rules would “kill” the internet as we know it, notably by banning “memes” —
an allegation forcefully rejected by the other side, which pointed out that
parody content was protected by pre-existing laws.

In the end, the advantage tipped to the anti-copyright camp. Invoking a
special Parliament procedure, opponents such as German Green MEP Julia Reda
gathered 76 allies to call a vote on whether to approve the mandate of
Parliament’s Legal Affairs Committee, which had earlier approved the bill.

The procedure, known as 69c, rarely succeeds, as it requires a simple
majority in Parliament to overturn the mandate. In this case, after
feverish lobbying and some last-minute about-faces — notably among German
conservatives — the attempt succeeded, sending the bill back to the drawing
board.

The vote was close, with 278 in favor, 318 against and 31 abstentions.

The anti-copyright camp won this round, but the war is not over. Lobbying
is set to intensify once again, as debates resume on one of Europe’s most
intensely watched legislative files.

Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now> | Modify
<https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=124698> Your Subscription |
Unsubscribe
Now
<https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=124698&id_secret=124698-d25cb511&post_id=20180705093022:8FB601EC-8057-11E8-8FDA-D6A13E5D8F0B>
<http://www.listbox.com>

――
View topic http://groups.dowire.org/r/topic/5WCFt2EeY3MMsfkcpKCxEd
Leave group mailto:newswire@groups.dowire.org?subject=Unsubscribe

Reply via email to