Carissimi,
volevo segnalarvi questo interessante pezzo su Noema.
In sintesi, il tema è come la sovrabbondanza di contenuti, lungi dal
"democratizzare" la scelta
rendendo gli utenti parte attiva di un processo di curatela, si sia
risolta di fatto più in un consumo passivoe in un "addestramento"
dell'utente da parte degli algoritmi.
"For most, the pleasures of  digital cultural consumption are
uncoupled from the exertions of  curatorship. Today’s digital
consumers are no longer being fed a limited  diet of standardized
cultural products, but they are still being fed.  Consumption may be
personalized, but it would be a stretch, in most  cases, to call it
self-directed — and it is not necessarily more active  than
pre-digital forms of “mass” cultural consumption. (...) Cultural 
populists, to be sure, tell a different story about the
democratization  of consumption. They are less concerned with
self-directed, active  consumption than emancipating people from elite
cultural tutelage. If  the TikTok algorithm delivers what people like
and want, that makes it  democratic in their eyes. (...) Moreover, as
the critic Rob Horning  has argued with respect to TikTok, algorithms
do not simply discern what  we want and serve it to us; they train us
to want what they can serve  us. Successful platforms do not just
discover what consumers want — they  produce the consumers and the
forms of consumer desire that they need. "
https://www.noemamag.com/hyperconnected-culture-and-its-discontents/ 

KR

Fed.
----------

http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/
https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/newsroom-curators-and-independent-storytellers-content-curation-new-form-journalism
 My latest book: Content Curation (Italian):
 http://www.amazon.it/Content-Curation-Federico-Guerrini/dp/8820366126

_______________________________________________
nexa mailing list
[email protected]
https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa

Reply via email to