Nella faq su https://opensourcedefinition.org/ è evidenziato che non si tratta di un fork bensì di un backup. Tuttavia viene fatto riferimento a una nuova versione 2.0 : che tu sappia il processo sarà guidato dagli stessi che hanno effettuato il backup?
Grazie, Antonio > Il giorno 28 ott 2024, alle ore 12:45, Giacomo Tesio <[email protected]> ha > scritto: > > We, the undersigned members of the Open Source community, assert that > Open Source is defined solely by the Open Source Definition (OSD) > version 1.9. > > Any amendments or new definitions shall only be recognized > if declared by clear community consensus through a transparent process > to be determined. > > ____ > > Dear Open Source Friends & Allies, > > For over two decades, the Open Source Definition (OSD) has been our > shared foundation, safeguarding software freedoms and fostering a > collaborative ecosystem. Forked from the Debian Free Software > Guidelines (DFSG), but until now aligned with them, the OSD has > consistently set the standard for Open Source. Yet today, the Open > Source Initiative (OSI) has introduced a new and divisive Open Source > AI Definition (OSAID) 1.0, developed through closed-door processes that > fundamentally conflict with the principles of openness and transparency > that underpin our movement. Broadly covering any software that “infers, > from the input it receives, how to generate outputs”, the OSAID is in > direct conflict with the existing standard, failing in both openness > and completeness dimensions. > > Continua su https://osd.fyi/ > > E' possibile sottoscriverla via email scrivendo a <~osd/[email protected]> > > > Giacomo
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
