Hi Piyush,

I like the changes.  Push! :-)

Jeff

On Jun 26, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Piyush Shivam wrote:

>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I would like to request a couple of code reviews for the bug that  
> was originally filed as 6224897: NFSV4 server and PCFS filesystem  
> don't like to discuss _PC_FILESIZEBITS. I have attached the initial  
> set of notes and background that I sent in the first round of code  
> review at the bottom. The summary of changes since the first code  
> review is as follows:
>
>
> -A new bug-synopsis: NFSv4 and v3 support for _PC_FILESIZEBITS is  
> incorrect and incomplete. The rationale is that PCFS started  
> supporting the _PC_FILESIZEBITS as of snv_15 hence the bug has  
> changed since being originally filed. Moreover, in the process of  
> providing a reasonable default maximum file size returned by the  
> server to the client for NFSv4, we noticed several other defects and  
> change of underlying file system behavior since the bug was  
> originally filed.
>
> -The NFSv3 and NFSv4 are inconsistent in the value of maximum file  
> size returned to the client. NFSv4 returns twice the maximum file  
> size as NFSv3. This is so because NFSv3 subtracts 1 from the number  
> of bits returned by VOP_PATHCONF, NFSv4 does not. The number of bits  
> returned by VOP_PATHCONF represent the minimum number of bits  
> required to represent the maximum file size as a signed quantity.  
> For example, for a 32 bit file system, the number of bits should be  
> 33 (32 + 1 sign bit). Hence, NFSv3 is doing the right thing and  
> NFSv4 should also do the same.
>
> -The maximum file size that should be returned to the client is  
> (2^63 - 1) even on a 64 bit system. This is because of llseek that  
> takes an offset_t as an argument, which is a signed long long, and  
> the maximum number that can be stored in a signed long long is (2^63  
> - 1). Thus, the VOP interface as a whole is limited to (2^63 - 1)  
> even if the file system is capable of (2^64 - 1) (or more). Hence,  
> for file systems that return 64 bits or more as a result of  
> VOP_PATHCONF call, the server returns the maximum file size of  
> INT_MAX instead of UNIT_MAX.
>
> -The error handling in v3 was incorrect. If the VOP_PATHCONF call  
> returns with an error, the server was returning a default file size;  
> all types errors were being interpreted as lack of support for  
> _PC_FILESIZEBITS. The fact is that if the underlying file system  
> does not support _PC_FILESIZEBITS, there is no error returned, but  
> VOP_PATHCONF call sets the number of bits to -1. Comparison with -1  
> is the precise way to determine the lack of support for  
> _PC_FILESIZEBITS. If there is an error, it should be bailed up.
>
> -UFS currently returns 41 as the number of bits required to  
> represent 2TB. This is incorrect as well, since UFS should return 42  
> (41 +1 sign bit). A separate bug will be filed to track this issue.
>
>
> The latest webrev is at:
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~pshivam/6224897_PC_FILESIZEBITS_latest/
>
>
> The previous webrev is at:
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~pshivam/6224897_PC_FILESIZEBITS
>
>
> Thanks,
> Piyush
>
>
>
> Background notes from the earlier mail:
>
>
> The NFSv4 server wants to determine the maximum file size of the
> underlying file system, e.g., at the client mount time. The server  
> uses
> VOP_PATHCONF(_PC_FILESIZEBITS) call to do so. The current server
> implementation does not handle the case where the underlying file  
> system
> does not support _PC_FILESIZEBITS pathconf query.
>
> The problem was first reported against PCFS. However, the problem no
> longer occurs with PCFS, since it supports _PC_FILESIZEBITS since
> snv_15. Nevertheless, NFSv4 needs to be more robust to the missing
> support for maximum file size from the underlying file system, and
> return a reasonable default.
>
> The current implementation seems to be doing the right thing
> accidentally (as far as I can tell). In the following check, the value
> of the variable val is -1 when the _PC_FILESIZEBITS is not supported  
> by
> the underlying file system. However, since val is an unsigned long,  
> the
> "if" condition evaluates to true, and UINT64_MAX is the default value
> for maxfilesize.
>
> 1573 error = VOP_PATHCONF(sarg->cs->vp,
> _PC_FILESIZEBITS, &val,
> 1574 sarg->cs->cr, NULL);
> 1575 if (error)
> 1576 break;
> 1577 if (val >= (sizeof (uint64_t) * 8))
> 1578 na->maxfilesize = UINT64_MAX;
> 1579 else
> 1580 na->maxfilesize = ((1LL << val) - 1);
> _______________________________________________
> nfs-discuss mailing list
> nfs-discuss at opensolaris.org


Reply via email to