Calum Mackay wrote: > Frank is absolutely right: for v4 they have both the stable storage > issue, and the way that v4 constructs its filehandles from ZFS. > > For v3, the stable storage issue is only of concern with using locking > (NLM/STATMON lockd/statd), and providing the device node numbers are the > same there should not be a filehandle issues, at least.
Thanks Frank and Calum! They have mentioned application problems with file locking too - which I have addressed. I hadn't considered state info in NFSv4 - thanks for the info Frank. SunCluster sure looks like the solution to me. :) Regards, - Neil
