Rich Brown wrote:
> On 12/03/08 05:19, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:29:35 +0100, Pavel Filipensky
>> <Pavel.Filipensky at sun.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Rob and Mike,
>>>
>>> new webrev is here: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~pavelf/6779275/
>>>
>>> Can you review that?
>>
>> looks reasonable sane to me. though this should get the elevation
>> of a selfreview PSARC case.
>>
> Hmm... Since this is a command line change, then it's going to need
> a PSARC fast-track. I've already exchanged e-mail with Pavel and
> suggested that he ask Dan Price (zones guy) to sponsor this. (I
> can do it if Dan can't/won't, but it's got to go through the zones
> team either way.)
>
> Also, this change means an update to the mountall(1M) man page (which
> includes umountall).
I think the question might be "Should this be documented a all ?"
in the terms of an interface ? maybe better suited for an undocumented,
internal ? the interface stability level of umountall(1M) is:
System Administration Commands mountall(1M)
____________________________________________________________
| ATTRIBUTE TYPE | ATTRIBUTE VALUE |
|_____________________________|_____________________________|
| Availability | SUNWcsu |
|_____________________________|_____________________________|
| Interface Stability | Committed |
|_____________________________|_____________________________|
| Output Stability | Uncommitted |
|_____________________________|_____________________________|
is committed, think about it - what outside observer should and
reasonably can use this new "-Z" option ?, its hard to get rid of it
later if for example this case would also seek patch binding in order to
allow a backport to previous releases (which I think is desired).
---
frankB
