Hi Bill,

----- Original Message -----

> > 
> > Sure looks to me like this is the mismatch (with librdmacm above)!
> 
> Should lib64/libntirpc.so not be linked against libibverbs.so too? The
> ldd command above does not show the dynamic linkage. Still the symbol is
> used, but with an unknown version (likely because it was not explicitly
> checked during linking).

Yes, it should.  This is the issue I suggested we check on 3 weeks ago, and 
again last week, when we looked over the ntirpc link line together, on your 
laptop.

Matt

> 
> > Does anybody out there know how to tell a library to use a
> > specific library version?
> 
> When building libntirpc, make sure that -libverbs is passed in the
> LD_FLAGS. I expect that libntirpc.so will have a versioned dependency on
> the symbol after that.
> 
> I might be able to try this out later this week. You are also more
> familiar with the libntirpc build process, and might be able to test
> this much quicker than me.
> 
> Niels
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list
> Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
> 

-- 
Matt Benjamin
Red Hat, Inc.
315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103

http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage

tel.  734-761-4689
fax.  734-769-8938
cel.  734-216-5309

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list
Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel

Reply via email to