On 4/11/16 11:51 AM, Frank Filz wrote: >> Thanks to all replies on this thread. >> >> Initially, we had developed our FSAL based on Ganesha 2.1 but later moved >> to 2.2 when we noticed that 2.1 binaries were not available. >> However, when moving to 2.2 we noticed that there were changes in the >> FSAL interface -- function prototypes etc... Since there is no more 2.2 > support >> we are thinking of moving to 2.3. But, before we do that any idea how much >> porting effort may be required to run a 2.2 FSAL against >> 2.3 Ganesha? > > The API changes should not be huge. > > There will be larger API changes in 2.5 or some future release. A new > extended API is introduced in 2.4, however the old API is supported in > parallel. At some point, the old API will be deprecated. > But there have been a tremendous number of bug fixes in 2.3 and 2.4.
If you are doing any new FSAL work, use the next as your base. There's simply no excuse for doing anything else. And of course, you could contribute the FSAL, so it would be in the archive.... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
