Varghese Devassy [v_deva...@yahoo.com] wrote: > Thanks to all replies on this thread. > > Initially, we had developed our FSAL based on Ganesha 2.1 but later > moved to 2.2 when we noticed that 2.1 binaries were not available. > However, when moving to 2.2 we noticed that there were changes in the > FSAL interface -- function prototypes etc... Since there is no more 2.2 > support we are thinking of moving to 2.3. But, before we do that any > idea how much porting effort may be required to run a 2.2 FSAL against > 2.3 Ganesha?
Porting to V2.3 should be easy as changes from V2.2 to V2.3 are mostly bug fixes and some clean ups. Regards, Malahal. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
