On 06/15/17 21:34, Doug Ortega wrote:
Frank,

Turns out that the nfs-ganesha proxy client was using a source port > 1024 for the nfs client connection to the server. I added the 'insecure' option to export in /etc/exports on the server to allow client connections from an unreserved source port. This let me get past the issue with the NFS4ERR_PERM being returned on the lookup.

Doug

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list
Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel


Hi Doug,


By default, it's true that the nfs-ganesha proxy client is using a source port > 1024 to connect the background nfs server. You have an option to change this. If you want the proxy client use a privileged port, you should use the Use_Privileged_Client_Port option as this :

PROXY
{
        Remote_Server
        {
                Srv_Addr=192.168.1.30;

                Use_Privileged_Client_Port = true;

        }
}


Let me know if you are facing any problem by using this option. I will be happy to try to fix it.


Regards

--
Patrice LUCAS
Ingenieur-Chercheur, CEA-DAM/DSSI/SISR/LA2S
tel : +33 (0)1 69 26 47 86
e-mail : patrice.lu...@cea.fr


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list
Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel

Reply via email to