> On 06/15/17 21:34, Doug Ortega wrote:
> > Frank,
> >
> > Turns out that the nfs-ganesha proxy client was using a source port >
> > 1024 for the nfs client connection to the server.  I added the
> > 'insecure' option to export in /etc/exports on the server to allow
> > client connections from an unreserved source port.  This let me get
> > past the issue with the NFS4ERR_PERM being returned on the lookup.
> >
> > Doug
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --------
> >
> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list
> > Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
> 
> 
> Hi Doug,
> 
> 
> By default, it's true that the nfs-ganesha proxy client is using a source 
> port >
> 1024 to connect the background nfs server. You have an option to change
> this. If you want the proxy client use a privileged port, you should use the
> Use_Privileged_Client_Port option as this :
> 
> PROXY
> {
>          Remote_Server
>          {
>                  Srv_Addr=192.168.1.30;
> 
>                  Use_Privileged_Client_Port = true;
> 
>          }
> }
> 
> 
> Let me know if you are facing any problem by using this option. I will be
> happy to try to fix it.

Hmm, should we change the default to true?

Frank


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list
Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel

Reply via email to