Right,
6bd32da613e26a768ac1dc4db1001395bd10c295 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the
correct tarball name
Went into 2.6 AFTER Bill’s Napalm. I couldn’t make enough sense of what had
changed to confidently do a backport…
The messiness in CMakeLists.txt with multiple different changes was one of the
reasons Bill’s Napalm got delayed a week…
Frank
From: Matt Benjamin [mailto:mbenj...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 2:15 PM
To: Frank Filz <ffilz...@mindspring.com>
Cc: Malahal Naineni <mala...@gmail.com>; Soumya Koduri <skod...@redhat.com>;
nfs-ganesha-devel <nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
I'm confused, napalm is 2.6-dev, not 2.5.x
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Frank Filz <ffilz...@mindspring.com
<mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> > wrote:
Actually, the problem was Bill’s Napalm…
I was able to make sense of the manual merge for
ff98ea64b6d1228443a35b2f7ceb3c61c0a0c1d1 Build libntirpc package when not using
system ntirpc
But not for
6bd32da613e26a768ac1dc4db1001395bd10c295 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the
correct tarball name
I pushed my results to
https://github.com/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/commits/V2.5-stable
Frank
From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com <mailto:mala...@gmail.com> ]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 10:39 AM
To: Frank Filz <ffilz...@mindspring.com <mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> >
Cc: Matt Benjamin <mbenj...@redhat.com <mailto:mbenj...@redhat.com> >; Soumya
Koduri <skod...@redhat.com <mailto:skod...@redhat.com> >; nfs-ganesha-devel
<nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >
Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
I did but the failover/failback code re-org looked like contributed, but I am
not positive.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Frank Filz <ffilz...@mindspring.com
<mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> > wrote:
Hmm, did you cherry pick in the original order?
I’ll take a look at this later today.
Frank
From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com <mailto:mala...@gmail.com> ]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 11:34 PM
To: Matt Benjamin <mbenj...@redhat.com <mailto:mbenj...@redhat.com> >
Cc: Frank Filz <ffilz...@mindspring.com <mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> >;
Soumya Koduri <skod...@redhat.com <mailto:skod...@redhat.com> >;
nfs-ganesha-devel <nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >
Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
Dan, I backported everything that was needed except the following 2 as I don't
want to mess with cmake! Can you please quickly send ported patches? Appreciate
your help. The latest V2.5 code is at my personal github branch V2.5-stable:
https://github.com/malahal/nfs-ganesha/commits/V2.5-stable
The following 2 commits failed to apply:
6bd32da613e26a768ac1dc4db1001395bd10c295 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the
correct tarball name
ff98ea64b6d1228443a35b2f7ceb3c61c0a0c1d1 Build libntirpc package when not using
system ntirpc
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Matt Benjamin <mbenj...@redhat.com
<mailto:mbenj...@redhat.com> > wrote:
Hi Frank,
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Frank Filz <ffilz...@mindspring.com
<mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> > wrote:
> Oh, nice.
>
>
> Matt, what about this one?
>
>
>
> 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified
RHCS doesn't officially support this, but I'd say it would be nice to have.
Matt
>
>
>
> Frank
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com <mailto:mala...@gmail.com> ]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 9:28 AM
> To: Soumya Koduri <skod...@redhat.com <mailto:skod...@redhat.com> >
> Cc: Frank Filz <ffilz...@mindspring.com <mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> >;
> d...@redhat.com <mailto:d...@redhat.com> ; Matt Benjamin
> <mbenj...@redhat.com <mailto:mbenj...@redhat.com> >; nfs-ganesha-devel
> <nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> <mailto:nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >
> Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
>
>
>
> I pushed a notes branch "refs/notes/backport" which has a note saying
> "backport to V2.5". You should be able to fetch this special branch with
> "git fetch origin refs/notes/*:refs/notes/*". After fetching this special
> branch, you should do "export GIT_NOTES_REF=refs/notes/backport" in your
> SHELL and then run the usual "git log" to see if I missed any commits you
> are interested in.
>
>
>
> Alternatively, the following are the commits that will NOT be back ported.
> Let me know if you need any of these. I will cherry pick things tomorrow and
> publish the branch, if there are no comments...
>
>
>
> 00b9e0798 Revert "CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball
> name"
>
> 1b60d5df2 FSAL_MEM - fix UP thread init/cleanup
>
> 39119aab0 FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for readdir
>
> 4b4e21ed9 Manpage - Fix installing manpages in RPM
>
> 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified
>
> b862fe360 SAL: extract fs logic from nfs4_recovery
>
> c29114162 Napalm dispatch plus plus
>
> c8bc40b69 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name
>
> cb787a1cf SAL: introduce new recovery backend based on rados kv store
>
> eadfc762e New (empty) sample config
>
> eb4eea134 config: add new config options for rados_kv recovery backend
>
> fbc905015 cmake: make modulized recovery backends compile as modules
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Soumya Koduri <skod...@redhat.com
> <mailto:skod...@redhat.com> > wrote:
>
>
>> commit 7f2d461277521301a417ca368d3c7656edbfc903
>> FSAL_GLUSTER: Reset caller_garray to NULL upon free
>>
>
> Yes
>
> On 08/09/2017 08:57 PM, Frank Filz wrote:
>
> 39119aa Soumya Koduri FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for
> readdir
>
> Yes? No? It's sort of a new feature, but may be critical for some use cases.
> I'd rather it go into stable than end up separately backported for
> downstream.
>
>
> Right..as it is more of a new feature, wrt upstream we wanted it to be part
> of only 2.6 on wards so as not to break stable branch (in case if there are
> nit issues).
>
> But yes we may end up back-porting to downstream if we do not rebase to 2.6
> by then.
>
> Thanks,
> Soumya
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list
> Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> <mailto:Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
>
>
>
>
> Virus-free. www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list
> Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> <mailto:Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
>
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free.
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>
www.avast.com
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list
Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
