Albert, this patch will not be accepted. Need to write another one, may be I'll try to do itlater.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Albert Casademont < albertcasadem...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, how did this end? Being considered for 1.9? > > Thanks! > > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Maxim Dounin <mdou...@mdounin.ru> wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 09:38:42PM +0300, kyprizel wrote: >> >> > Sure it should be tested (there are can be some memory leaks). >> > Need to know if it's idologically acceptable. >> >> I've provided some comments in the reply to your off-list message. >> >> -- >> Maxim Dounin >> http://nginx.org/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nginx-devel mailing list >> nginx-devel@nginx.org >> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel >> > > > _______________________________________________ > nginx-devel mailing list > nginx-devel@nginx.org > http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel >
_______________________________________________ nginx-devel mailing list nginx-devel@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
