Hi. As I'm having some spare time ahead me, i can work on this subject, if you're agree.
I will send you a PM, about the details. Regards, Filipe 2015-03-24 22:20 GMT+01:00 kyprizel <kypri...@gmail.com>: > Albert, this patch will not be accepted. Need to write another one, may be > I'll try to do itlater. > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Albert Casademont > <albertcasadem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, how did this end? Being considered for 1.9? >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Maxim Dounin <mdou...@mdounin.ru> wrote: >>> >>> Hello! >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 09:38:42PM +0300, kyprizel wrote: >>> >>> > Sure it should be tested (there are can be some memory leaks). >>> > Need to know if it's idologically acceptable. >>> >>> I've provided some comments in the reply to your off-list message. >>> >>> -- >>> Maxim Dounin >>> http://nginx.org/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> nginx-devel mailing list >>> nginx-devel@nginx.org >>> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nginx-devel mailing list >> nginx-devel@nginx.org >> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > nginx-devel mailing list > nginx-devel@nginx.org > http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel _______________________________________________ nginx-devel mailing list nginx-devel@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
