+1, but I have zero XSD knowledge.

On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Andrey Shchekin <[email protected]> wrote:

> There is also some kind of "meta-attributes", but they are really ugly.My
> opinion is that right approach is to fix the schema and NH loader (so it
> adds additional attributes to the loaded schema, as it does with
> MetaAttributes).
>
> I have no idea on hard it is (schema -- trivial, deserialization -- ?), but
> I think it is just the right thing to do.
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:11 AM, mathieu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I tried this, had validation errors, asked this question on
>> stackoverflow (here :
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1585959/extend-an-xml-schema
>> ) and came to this conclusion :
>> To do that, you would have to modify the existing nhibernate-
>> mapping.xsd, don't you ?
>>
>> So, what about an "other" mapping file, alongside the .hbm.xml
>> (something in the likes of .hsbm.xml) ?
>>
>>
>> On 18 oct, 13:42, "Andrey Shchekin (ashmind)" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Well for my project right now I just did a very simple custom mapping.
>> > I was considering <class name="MediaItem" table="MediaItems"
>> > search:indexed="true", but not with the changelist I already had.
>> >
>> > Maybe later, if no one else does that.
>> >
>> > On Oct 18, 3:32 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Applied, thanks.
>> > > We would be very happy to see another mapping strategy implemented :-)
>> >
>> > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Andrey Shchekin (ashmind) <
>> >
>> > > [email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > Ayende,
>> >
>> > > > That's strange, my version information currently is
>> > > > URL:
>> > > >
>> https://nhcontrib.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/nhcontrib/trunk/src/NHi...
>> > > > Revision/Author<
>> https://nhcontrib.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/nhcontrib/trunk/src/NHi..
>> .>:
>> > > >        1049 ayenderahien
>> > > > Last commit revision: 1045
>> > > > Is it a wrong version?
>> >
>> > > > I re-generated and added to the issue (
>> http://nhjira.koah.net/secure/
>> > > > attachment/12956/ashmind-NHibernate.Search-ISearchMapping.patch<
>> http://nhjira.koah.net/secure/%0Aattachment/12956/ashmind-NHibernate....>
>> > > > )
>> > > > Sorry for the same name.
>> >
>> > > > But according to file comparer it is not really different from the
>> > > > original patch (except some small stuff I added since).
>> >
>> > > > On Oct 18, 4:19 am, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > Andrey,
>> > > > > I tried to apply the patch, but it seems to be against an old
>> version of
>> > > > NH
>> > > > > Search, and there are a LOT of conlicts.
>> > > > > Can you regenerate the patch against the trunk?
>> >
>> > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Andrey Shchekin (ashmind) <
>> >
>> > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > > Hello everyone,
>> >
>> > > > > > I have created a patch that implements the abstraction of
>> mapping
>> > > > > > strategy for NHibernate.Search.
>> > > > > > Now it is not limited to attributes.
>> >
>> > > > > > What is the review process and when it can get integrated if
>> > > > > > everything is ok?
>> > > > > > Seeing some previous post in this group I started by creating a
>> JIRA
>> > > > > > issue:
>> > > > > >http://nhjira.koah.net/browse/NHSR-24
>> >
>> > > > > > But I am still interested in what is the integration estimate,
>> because
>> > > > > > the changes are somewhat significant and later integration can
>> lead to
>> > > > > > a merging problems.
>> >
>> > > > > > Andrey Shchekin
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NHibernate Contrib - Development Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com.ar/group/nhcdevs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to