Hi I join the discussion just to extend the question: I really would liek to have back again an attribute based mapping strategy, maybe with some convention over configuration addition, and I would like to start to work on it. What is the point now with the standard Mapping Attributes ? Are they still mantained ? If not would be a problem if I try to mantain it myself ( and make it grow in the direction I said) ? If you accept my contribution would you suggest me to start with the new mapping by code features ? In some of my experiments I'm trying to just use the standard Hbm* classes, do you change these low level classes in the future ?
On May 12, 9:20 pm, Dario Quintana <[email protected]> wrote: > I asume is some kind of experiment looooong time ago, nevermind. > For NHibernate mapping you should go using: > > - NHibernate hbm files. > - NHibernate by code in NH 3.2 > - ConfOrm > - Fluent NHibernate > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Ricardo Peres <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > Just for curiosity, what is this NHibernate Annotations project in the > > sandbox? Is it going to replace the old NHibernate Attributes? > > Thanks! > > > RP > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "NHibernate Contrib - Development Group" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhcdevs?hl=en. > > -- > Dario Quintana -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NHibernate Contrib - Development Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhcdevs?hl=en.
