Ok Dario, Thanks for your suggestion. That is cetainly true, but I want to try to have something even supporting legacy DB with horrible composite keys :) Felix
On Jun 6, 2:27 pm, Dario Quintana <[email protected]> wrote: > In ConfORM, you may declare your mappings even without attributes, and if > need to declare something special, like: "I want that every property with > the property [Ignore] shouldn't be mapped" you may declare a pattern for > that. > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:17 AM, FaticaLabs <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes I did, as a general approach I still prefer hbm with intellisense > > +hbm2net. But I'm thinking to have the attributes alternative reliable > > would be interesting, this is the reason I'm asking. > > -- > Dario Quintana -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NHibernate Contrib - Development Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhcdevs?hl=en.
