Ok, yes it is there, but not in wiki format. The wiki formatted reference doesn't have many of the sections in the current docbook/static version.
So basically what I'm hearing is that we need someone (probably me) to grab the most current docbook version and convert that to this wiki. At that point I'd recommend removing the docbook from the repo or freezing it etc. We can review the Hibernate version for ideas if needed, but keeping it online for easy editing seems more effective. Should I make one big "Page" or separate out each section into a separate "Page"? Still no fix on the revision history "revised by" bug? -Will On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Fabio Maulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/10/1 Will Shaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Are we going to move the documentation here: >> http://www.hibernate.org/hib_docs/nhibernate/1.2/reference/en/html_single/ >> to nhforge.org? > > http://www.nhforge.org/wikis/reference2-0en/preface.aspx click on Here > static reference to go to > http://www.nhforge.org/doc/nh/en/index.html > >> >> Can we make a copy, label it 2.0, and go to town on it? > > As you can see it was labeled as 2.0. > >> >> There are a >> number of things that need cleaning up / revising. I'm willing to work >> on them as I come across them... > > The documentation was written using DocBook and it is part of the > branch/trunk. > You can find it in nhibernate\doc\reference\modules > >> >> Do we need someone to do the work of transferring this document into >> the nhforge wiki? > > Puf..... sure. I start the work but it need long time > http://www.nhforge.org/wikis/reference2-0en/default.aspx > > In the right "Pages" is the table of content. > >> >> Is the verison in the trunk more up-to-date than the >> online one? > > In trunk it is the same of that published in Knol and in NHforge wiki. > >> >> Should I do the work to copy it over? > > Anything you have time to do with the documentation is welcome. > I'm not sure about what is better... do the work in DocBook and then copy to > the wiki or directly to the wiki (each have pros/cons). > The wiki can be maintained actualized by everyone. Maintain the DocBook, > apparently, is not part of committers interests (facts speak by they self). > In the trunk we need to add the doc of some available new features; some one > can be copied from H3.2 doc but some others (for example all added in > Criteria API) are NH specific features. > -- > Fabio Maulo >
