I also would suggest that you don't duplicate efforts and ask the Fluent NHibernate guys! There are some top shots behind this implementation. And its implementation is already very advanced. So better help them on the parts that are still missing.
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Fabio Maulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, have a response from Fluent.NH team would be nice. > > 2008/11/4 Tuna Toksöz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hello all, >> >> Me and my friend Oguz want to start a new project about NHibernate Fluent >> Mapping. If we show some progress and reach to a point where we let people >> use, the project can become part of Core or Contrib if other committers >> want. >> >> There is one project on fluent mapping called Fluent NHibernate which does >> its job well, but it creates XML behind the scenes, which I don't like >> >> I have committer access so when needed I can extend the core according to >> needs. Currently Configuration & Mappings depends on XML which is not a good >> idea and needs improvement. >> The extension points will also allow other ways of mapping including DSLs. >> >> >> Now it comes to the questions: >> >> Do you think it would be beneficial to the community, or are we just >> duplicating things. I will talk with Fluent NH Team to see how they can >> help, and how we can help. >> Do you like how NH Fluent handles mapping, in other words, inheritance, or >> do you prefer real fluent interfaces? >> >> Thanks all. >> >> -- >> Tuna Toksöz >> >> Typos included to enhance the readers attention! >> > > > > -- > Fabio Maulo > -- Dr. Gabriel Schenker Apprimus Informatik GmbH In der Gass 19 CH-8627 Grüningen http://www.apprimus.ch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
