Steve: In order not to duplicate, i think we'll go in collaboration with them, depends on what other committers and community thinks
All: http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate/browse_thread/thread/44f7176442aa0d85?hl=en This is the topic we are talking on Fluent NHib and how we can go. Looks like they are _very_ excited about it. What do you guys think? On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Steve Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like this very much! What i dont like in the current > implementation of Fluent NHibernate is that the naming of the mapping > property's are dose not follow the naming in NHibernate Xml Mapping. > This has the disadvantage that i can not use 100% of the existing > NHibernate documentation. And i dont think that names like "References" > are easyer to understand then "Many2One". > > Tuna Toksöz schrieb: > > Hello all, > > > > Me and my friend Oguz want to start a new project about NHibernate Fluent > > Mapping. If we show some progress and reach to a point where we let > people > > use, the project can become part of Core or Contrib if other committers > > want. > > > > There is one project on fluent mapping called Fluent NHibernate which > does > > its job well, but it creates XML behind the scenes, which I don't like > > > > I have committer access so when needed I can extend the core according to > > needs. Currently Configuration & Mappings depends on XML which is not a > good > > idea and needs improvement. > > The extension points will also allow other ways of mapping including > DSLs. > > > > Now it comes to the questions: > > > > Do you think it would be beneficial to the community, or are we just > > duplicating things. I will talk with Fluent NH Team to see how they can > > help, and how we can help. > > Do you like how NH Fluent handles mapping, in other words, inheritance, > or > > do you prefer real fluent interfaces? > > > > Thanks all. > > > -- Tuna Toksöz Typos included to enhance the readers attention!
