the nant scripts could remain available though... but right now, i consider those scripts to be pretty much unmaintainable and a horrible mess
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Dario Quintana < conta...@darioquintana.com.ar> wrote: > One reason to get NAnt running is for who use Mono. > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Davy Brion <ral...@davybrion.com> wrote: > >> any idea on how the msbuild story on mono is these days? ie... will it >> work 'out-of-the-box'? >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Ayende Rahien <aye...@ayende.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 And I have used MSBuild for a long time in Rhino Tools >>> I used the same generate assemblyinfo approach, you can still find it in >>> the SVN archives. >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Davy Brion <ral...@davybrion.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> i'm trying to get everything up and running on the buildserver, and nant >>>> is causing some problems with regards to easily being able to run tests for >>>> various database configurations. >>>> >>>> Seeing as how the nant build scripts are way too complex (at least for >>>> my taste), i propose we move to a simpler msbuild script. I have some >>>> experience with msbuild, and while it's not perfect i do think it's simpler >>>> than nant. >>>> >>>> Would there be any objections from any of you with regards to moving to >>>> msbuild? >>>> >>>> There would be one breaking-change though... currently, none of our >>>> projects have an AssemblyInfo.cs file because nant creates it (i'm told to >>>> make sure that each AssemblyInfo.cs file contains the same versioning >>>> information). I've never used that approach with msbuild, but there are >>>> msbuild tasks available to keep the versioning information in synch across >>>> projects. So if we do go ahead with this, we would have to add an >>>> AssemblyInfo.cs file to each project again. >>>> >>>> Other than that, i think we can create a pretty simple script to build >>>> the project, run the tests (for whatever database configuration you'd like) >>>> and once that's working we can add automated binary and source packaging to >>>> the mix as well. >>>> >>>> So, any objections? Or other suggestions? >>>> >>>> brs, >>>> Davy >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Dario Quintana > http://darioquintana.com.ar >
