Can you elaborate on what the issues are with Nant and multiple db configurations? Converting to MsBuild is a) a bunch of work and b) going to make Mono devs less happy. Plus I think of Nant as being a bit more powerful than MsBuild. I would have thought it makes more sense to make the db configuration problem work in nant that to rewrite.
Jon From: nhibernate-development@googlegroups.com [mailto:nhibernate-developm...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ayende Rahien Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 1:13 PM To: nhibernate-development@googlegroups.com Subject: [nhibernate-development] Re: proposal: move from nant build scripts to msbuild scripts They are not unmaintainable, they are just complex. They are also the foundation for Castle, Rhino Tools, and I just installed them for a new project :-) On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Davy Brion <ral...@davybrion.com> wrote: the nant scripts could remain available though... but right now, i consider those scripts to be pretty much unmaintainable and a horrible mess On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Dario Quintana <conta...@darioquintana.com.ar> wrote: One reason to get NAnt running is for who use Mono. On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Davy Brion <ral...@davybrion.com> wrote: any idea on how the msbuild story on mono is these days? ie... will it work 'out-of-the-box'? On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Ayende Rahien <aye...@ayende.com> wrote: +1 And I have used MSBuild for a long time in Rhino Tools I used the same generate assemblyinfo approach, you can still find it in the SVN archives. On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Davy Brion <ral...@davybrion.com> wrote: Hi guys, i'm trying to get everything up and running on the buildserver, and nant is causing some problems with regards to easily being able to run tests for various database configurations. Seeing as how the nant build scripts are way too complex (at least for my taste), i propose we move to a simpler msbuild script. I have some experience with msbuild, and while it's not perfect i do think it's simpler than nant. Would there be any objections from any of you with regards to moving to msbuild? There would be one breaking-change though... currently, none of our projects have an AssemblyInfo.cs file because nant creates it (i'm told to make sure that each AssemblyInfo.cs file contains the same versioning information). I've never used that approach with msbuild, but there are msbuild tasks available to keep the versioning information in synch across projects. So if we do go ahead with this, we would have to add an AssemblyInfo.cs file to each project again. Other than that, i think we can create a pretty simple script to build the project, run the tests (for whatever database configuration you'd like) and once that's working we can add automated binary and source packaging to the mix as well. So, any objections? Or other suggestions? brs, Davy -- Dario Quintana http://darioquintana.com.ar <http://darioquintana.com.ar/>
