I would say that this should be broken then.
What I would expect it to do is compare the ids, but that is okay, since we
can just user e.Reverse.id = a.Forward.id

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Steve <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> The new parser does type checking on comparisons, and e.Reverse is not
> comparable to a.Forward (the first is of type A, the second of type E)
>
> On Apr 15, 12:21 am, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Steve,
> > That is great job.
> > Looking at the test results, I am fine with breaking all of them, except
> > for:
> > "from E e, A a where e.Reverse = a.Forward and a = ?"
> >
> > Looking at this, I am not sure _why_ this should generate a _parser_
> error.
> > From syntax perspective, it seems to be valid.
> >
> > My point of view is in two points:
> > a) if we match Hibernate's behavior, we are good, because that is our
> spec,
> > for most things
> > b) we _can_ break backward compat in small ways. We are going to ship
> both
> > parsers for at least a while, and give the user the configuration option
> to
> > select one. That means that if a user is hit by a backward compat bug
> here,
> > they can just revert to the old parser, and continue using that. That is
> an
> > acceptable solution from my point of view.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Steve <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Chaps,
> >
> > > Finally, another update on the HQL AST parser work.  I've had a few
> > > other things on my plate the last couple of weeks, but managed to get
> > > a few hours in on the parser.  This post was coming out on Monday, but
> > > I thought I'd better resync with the NHibernate trunk, and alas it
> > > broke a couple of things.   They are now fixed, so finally I think
> > > we're nearly there.  I've got a little bit of refactoring to do, and
> > > sort out the error handling, but it's nothing major at all, and
> > > doesn't stop me form getting onto the LINQ side of things at last.
> > > There are a few tests that are failing which I could use your opinions
> > > on whether the new behaviour is acceptable or not - these are listed
> > > below.
> >
> > > If anyone wants to test this, you should just be able to get the HQL
> > > AST parser from the uNhAddins repository, build it and drop the binary
> > > into the NHibernate.Tests\bin\Debug-2.0. Finally, add the following to
> > > your config:
> >
> > >        <property
> >
> > >
> name="query.factory_class">NHibernate.Hql.Ast.ANTLR.ASTQueryTranslatorFacto
> ry,
> > > ANTLR-HQL</property>
> >
> > > One last thing, there's a change you´ll need to make to a minor change
> > > to MultiQueryImpl.AggregateQueriesInformation() - change the foreach
> > > from
> > >        foreach (QueryTranslator translator in queryTranslators)
> > > to
> > >        foreach (IQueryTranslator translator in queryTranslators)
> >
> > > and this line:
> > >        SqlCommandInfo commandInfo = translator.GetQueryStringAndTypes
> > > (session, queryParameters);
> > > to
> > >        SqlCommandInfo commandInfo =
> > > translator.Loader.GetQueryStringAndTypes
> > > (session, queryParameters);
> >
> > > (I've sent a patch to Fabio, so hopefully this'll end up in the trunk
> > > soon)
> >
> > > That's the lot.  I'm off to look at LINQ, and if you can let me know
> > > how to handle the issues below, that would be cool.
> >
> > > Cheers,
> >
> > > Steve
> >
> > > ========================
> >
> > > TestCase 'NHibernate.Test.Hql.HQLFunctions.Cast' failed:
> > >  Expected: 1.29999995f
> > >  But was:  1.3d
> >
> > >  Z:\NHibernate\Trunk\nhibernate\src\NHibernate.Test\HQL\HQLFunctions.cs
> > > (598,0): at NHibernate.Test.Hql.HQLFunctions.Cast()
> >
> > > The query that is being executed here is "select cast(cast
> > > (a.BodyWeight as string) as Double) from Animal a".  The new parser is
> > > returning 1.3 as a double, but the test is comparing the return value
> > > with 1.3F (i.e., a single), and the vagaries of floating point math
> > > causes failures when doing the comparisons.  The old parser returned
> > > Singles for this test, hence it worked.  So the question is, should
> > > the new parser be changed to return Singles, or should the test be
> > > updated?
> >
> > > ========================
> >
> > > Error: line 1:-1 no viable alternative at input 'is'
> > > TestCase 'NHibernate.Test.Hql.HQLFunctions.Nullif'
> > > failed: System.InvalidCastException : Unable to cast object of type
> > > 'Antlr.Runtime.CommonErrorNode' to type
> > > 'NHibernate.Hql.Ast.ANTLR.Tree.IASTNode'.
> > >
>  Z:\uNhAddins\Trunk\ANTLR-HQL\ANTLR-HQL\Output\HqlParser.cs(5698,0):
> > > at NHibernate.Hql.Ast.ANTLR.HqlParser.relationalExpression()
> > >        [middle of stack deleted for brevity]
> >
> > >  Z:\NHibernate\Trunk\nhibernate\src\NHibernate.Test\HQL\HQLFunctions.cs
> > > (428,0): at NHibernate.Test.Hql.HQLFunctions.Nullif()
> >
> > > The query here is "from Human h where nullif(h.NickName, '1e1') not is
> > > null", and the new parser doesn't understand the "not is null"
> > > construct.  The behaviour here matches Hibernate, which also fails
> > > with a query of this form.  I for one don't like the syntax here, so
> > > would be happy leaving it "broken". The user can obviously re-write
> > > the query to get the required results (i.e., by using "is not null"
> > > rather than the sucky "not is null"). Thoughts? BTW, ignore the
> > > InvalidCastException that shows up in the error above, I've got to
> > > sort out the error handling bit; it's not been high on the list, since
> > > it's "just code" - nothing that is going to cause any issues :)
> >
> > > ========================
> >
> > > failed: NHibernate.TypeMismatchException : left and right hand sides
> > > of a binary logic operator were incompatibile
> > > [NHibernate.DomainModel.A : NHibernate.DomainModel.E]
> > > TearDown : System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException : Exception has
> > > been thrown by the target of an invocation.
> > >  ----> NUnit.Framework.AssertionException : Test didn't clean up
> > > after itself
> >
> > >  Z:\uNhAddins\Trunk\ANTLR-HQL\ANTLR-HQL\Tree\BinaryLogicOperatorNode.cs
> > > (85,0): at
> >
> > >
> NHibernate.Hql.Ast.ANTLR.Tree.BinaryLogicOperatorNode.MutateRowValueConstru
> ctorSyntaxesIfNecessary
> > > (IType lhsType, IType rhsType)
> > >        [middle of stack deleted for brevity]
> > >        Z:\NHibernate\Trunk\nhibernate\src\NHibernate.Test\Legacy
> > > \ABCProxyTest.cs(292,0): at
> > > NHibernate.Test.Legacy.ABCProxyTest.OneToOne()
> >
> > > The query here is "from E e, A a where e.Reverse = a.Forward and a
> > > = ?".  I think the new parser has this correct (I won't explain the
> > > domain model here, it's probably easier if you just look at the
> > > code).  To back up my claim, Hibernate shows the same behaviour for
> > > this test :)  Take a look at the test and associated model, and let me
> > > know what you think should happen.
> >
> > > ========================
> >
> > > The following 4 are all from the Legacy test fixtures, and they all
> > > fail in Hibernate in the same way.  Since they are under legacy, I've
> > > not spent much time looking at them.  Are they things we need to
> > > support in the new parser?
> >
> > > TestCase 'NHibernate.Test.Legacy.FooBarTest.CollectionsInSelect'
> > > failed: System.NullReferenceException : Object reference not set to an
> > > instance of an object.
> > > TearDown : System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException : Exception has
> > > been thrown by the target of an invocation.
> > >  ----> NUnit.Framework.AssertionException : Test didn't clean up
> > > after itself. session closed: False database cleaned: True connection
> > > closed: True
> > >
>  Z:\uNhAddins\Trunk\ANTLR-HQL\ANTLR-HQL\Tree\SelectExpressionList.cs
> > > (30,0): at
> > >
> NHibernate.Hql.Ast.ANTLR.Tree.SelectExpressionList.CollectSelectExpressions
> > > ()
> > >        [middle of stack deleted for brevity]
> > >        Z:\NHibernate\Trunk\nhibernate\src\NHibernate.Test\Legacy
> > > \FooBarTest.cs(2471,0): at
> > > NHibernate.Test.Legacy.FooBarTest.CollectionsInSelect()
> > > Query was "select count(*) from Bar as bar where '1' in (from g in
> > > bar.Component.Glarch.ProxyArray.elements where g.Name='foo')"
> >
> > > TestCase 'NHibernate.Test.Legacy.FooBarTest.Query'
> > > failed: NHibernate.ADOException : could not execute query
> > > [SQL: select bar0_.[foo_id] as foo1_517_, bar0_.Version as
> > > Version517_, bar0_.foo as foo517_, bar0_.long_ as long5_517_, bar0_.
> > > [@@##integer_  *] as column6_517_, bar0_.float_ as float7_517_,
> > > bar0_.X as X517_, bar0_.date_ as date9_517_, bar0_.timestamp_ as
> > > timestamp10_517_, bar0_.boolean_ as boolean11_517_, bar0_.bool_ as
> > > bool12_517_, bar0_.null_ as null13_517_, bar0_.short_ as short14_517_,
> > > bar0_.char_ as char15_517_, bar0_.zero_ as zero16_517_, bar0_.int_ as
> > > int17_517_, bar0_.string_ as string18_517_, bar0_.byte_ as
> > > byte19_517_, bar0_.YesNo as YesNo517_, bar0_.[stat...@###] as
> > > status21_517_, bar0_.[localeayzabc1...@#$] as localea22_517_,
> > > bar0_.first_name as first23_517_, bar0_.surname as surname517_,
> > > bar0_.Dependent as Dependent517_, bar0_.count_ as count26_517_,
> > > bar0_.name_ as name27_517_, bar0_.g__ as g28_517_, bar0_.cmpnt_null_
> > > as cmpnt29_517_, bar0_.subcount as subcount517_, bar0_.subname as
> > > subname517_, bar0_.fee_sub as fee32_517_, bar0_.null_cmpnt_ as
> > > null33_517_, bar0_.the_time as the34_517_, bar0_.Baz as Baz517_,
> > > bar0_.bar_String as bar36_517_, bar0_.name_name as name37_517_,
> > > bar0_.bar_count as bar38_517_, bar0_.Name as Name517_, bar0_.clazz as
> > > clazz517_, bar0_.[gen_id] as gen41_517_, 2 * bar0_.int_ as formula37_
> > > from [foos] bar0_, StringDateMap stringdate2_ where bar0_.
> > > [$foo_subclass^]='B' and bar0_.Baz=baz1_.baz_id and
> > > baz1_.baz_id=stringdate2_.id_ and stringdate2_.map_key = 'now' and
> > > (stringdate2_.map_value is not null)]
> > >  ----> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException : The multi-part identifier
> > > "baz1_.baz_id" could not be bound.
> > > The multi-part identifier "baz1_.baz_id" could not be bound.
> > > TearDown : System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException : Exception has
> > > been thrown by the target of an invocation.
> > >  ----> NUnit.Framework.AssertionException : Test didn't clean up
> > > after itself. session closed: False database cleaned: False connection
> > > closed: True
> > >        Z:\NHibernate\Trunk\nhibernate\src\NHibernate\Loader\Loader.cs
> > > (1661,0): at NHibernate.Loader.Loader.DoList(ISessionImplementor
> > > session, QueryParameters queryParameters)
> > >        [middle of stack deleted for brevity]
> > >        Z:\NHibernate\Trunk\nhibernate\src\NHibernate.Test\Legacy
> > > \FooBarTest.cs(855,0): at NHibernate.Test.Legacy.FooBarTest.Query()
> > > Query was "select bar from Bar bar where bar.Baz.StringDateMap['now']
> > > is not null"
> >
> > > TestCase 'NHibernate.Test.Legacy.MasterDetailTest.CollectionQuery'
> > > failed: System.NullReferenceException : Object reference not set to an
> > > instance of an object.
> > > TearDown : System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException : Exception has
> > > been thrown by the target of an invocation.
> > >  ---->
> >
> > ...
> >
> > read more »
>

Reply via email to