I think that users who are living on the edge in OSS, will have no problem with setting a line in the config to get the old parser should they need it.
The users that have trust issues, are using 1.2 anyway. On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Davy Brion <[email protected]> wrote: > i know why i write tests, but i have no idea why people in the past didn't > always do so... our tests simply won't catch everything > > personally, i think the safest choice should be the default... the new > parser should IMO become the default after the 2.1 release > > if this new parser turns out to cause problems in the 2.1 release which > could've been avoided by staying with the old parser, our users probably > won't have much trust left in the NH team and it won't be easy to win it > back either. > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2009/4/16 Davy Brion <[email protected]> >> >>> wait, are we really going to have the new AST parser as the default one >>> for the 2.1 release? We might have 1700 tests, but our test suite isn't >>> really all that great and having the new AST parser as the default at this >>> point would be a bit risky i think. >> >> >> If you are afraid you can configure NH to use the "Classic" >> queryTranslator (is only one line in the session-factory configuration). >> >> Now think about this: >> Why you are writing tests ? >> >> Don't be afraid Davy, trust in your self and in the NH's team. >> >> -- >> Fabio Maulo >> >> P.S. check the log of SVN to understand when 2.0 born and than check which >> is the most important issue fixed between 2.0.0 and 2.0.1 (note 2.0.1 has >> the record of NH downloads; today is 56412) >> > > -- Ken Egozi. http://www.kenegozi.com/blog http://www.delver.com http://www.musicglue.com http://www.castleproject.org http://www.gotfriends.co.il
