yes, we can and should, since there is a disagreement here.
I suggest doing this on the nhusers mailing list, since this would be a way
to get input from the users themselves about this

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Davy Brion <[email protected]> wrote:

> not exactly a strong argument IMO
>
> can't we at least vote on this or something?
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In our team there are few occasions where I and Oren agree the same
>> solution and when it happen can not be missed.
>>
>> 2009/4/16 Davy Brion <[email protected]>
>>
>>> i know why i write tests, but i have no idea why people in the past
>>> didn't always do so... our tests simply won't catch everything
>>>
>>> personally, i think the safest choice should be the default... the new
>>> parser should IMO become the default after the 2.1 release
>>>
>>> if this new parser turns out to cause problems in the 2.1 release which
>>> could've been avoided by staying with the old parser, our users probably
>>> won't have much trust left in the NH team and it won't be easy to win it
>>> back either.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> 2009/4/16 Davy Brion <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>>> wait, are we really going to have the new AST parser as the default one
>>>>> for the 2.1 release? We might have 1700 tests, but our test suite isn't
>>>>> really all that great and having the new AST parser as the default at this
>>>>> point would be a bit risky i think.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you are afraid you can configure NH to use the "Classic"
>>>> queryTranslator (is only one line in the session-factory configuration).
>>>>
>>>> Now think about this:
>>>>  Why you are writing tests ?
>>>>
>>>> Don't be afraid Davy, trust in your self and in the NH's team.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Fabio Maulo
>>>>
>>>> P.S. check the log of SVN to understand when 2.0 born and than check
>>>> which is the most important issue fixed between 2.0.0 and 2.0.1 (note 2.0.1
>>>> has the record of NH downloads; today is 56412)
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fabio Maulo
>>
>
>

Reply via email to