All fixed.

Johannes, thanks for tests.

On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Johannes Gustafsson
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm probably being redundant but these are the tickets that I created
> regarding this:
>
> http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2092
>  <http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2092>
> http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2093
>  <http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2093>
> http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2094
>  <http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2094>
> http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2102
>
> 2092 and 2093 contains proposed fixes. 2102 is the breaking change that I
> believe you are looking for (one-to-one relations generates field
> intercepting proxies).
>
> Thanks,
> Johannes
>
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Yes.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:33 AM, John Davidson <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Is this the thread you are looking for. Johannes notes 2 failing tests at
>>> the bottom f the first message.
>>>
>>> https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#search/Gustafsson/126a10247f94c29e
>>>
>>> <https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#search/Gustafsson/126a10247f94c29e>John
>>> Davidson
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> mmmm... I don't think so..
>>>> Even if Johannes Gustafsson have used another thread to send the list I
>>>> was looking for there are some open issues related to lazy-properties.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> They were reported on the JIRA, IIRC, and fixed.
>>>>> Can't remember issue numbers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> IIRC there was two main issues (one breaking change), related to the
>>>>>> implementation if lazy-property, reported in JIRA.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you help me to find it ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> P.S. I hope the reporter is reading this mail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Fabio Maulo
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Fabio Maulo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fabio Maulo
>>
>>
>


-- 
Fabio Maulo

Reply via email to