many times, in NH, a simple code line make the difference... unfortunately this does not happen all the time. Thanks to you to provide tests, doing so we can concentrate our effort to fix the problem instead in recreate the scenario.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Johannes Gustafsson <[email protected]>wrote: > Awesome! Thank you! > > /Johannes > > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> All fixed. >> >> Johannes, thanks for tests. >> >> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Johannes Gustafsson < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm probably being redundant but these are the tickets that I created >>> regarding this: >>> >>> http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2092 >>> <http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2092> >>> http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2093 >>> <http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2093> >>> http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2094 >>> <http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2094> >>> http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2102 >>> >>> 2092 and 2093 contains proposed fixes. 2102 is the breaking change that I >>> believe you are looking for (one-to-one relations generates field >>> intercepting proxies). >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Johannes >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Yes. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:33 AM, John Davidson <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is this the thread you are looking for. Johannes notes 2 failing tests >>>>> at the bottom f the first message. >>>>> >>>>> https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#search/Gustafsson/126a10247f94c29e >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> <https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#search/Gustafsson/126a10247f94c29e>John >>>>> Davidson >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> mmmm... I don't think so.. >>>>>> Even if Johannes Gustafsson have used another thread to send the list >>>>>> I was looking for there are some open issues related to lazy-properties. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> They were reported on the JIRA, IIRC, and fixed. >>>>>>> Can't remember issue numbers >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Fabio Maulo >>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> IIRC there was two main issues (one breaking change), related to the >>>>>>>> implementation if lazy-property, reported in JIRA. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can you help me to find it ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> P.S. I hope the reporter is reading this mail. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Fabio Maulo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Fabio Maulo >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Fabio Maulo >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Fabio Maulo >> >> > -- Fabio Maulo
