Patrick, Are you sure that the client-profile-support is so fundamental ? So far you are the only one talking about it.
Before begin a big work in NH-3 I would be sure about how much important is the client-profile-support for NH future. On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Patrick Earl <[email protected]> wrote: > For myself, I'm not particularly opinionated in any direction other > than the direction that will allow for client profile support. If > this happens through a custom pluggable logging layer, common.logging, > or some other way, I'm happy. It seems like the common.logging > library is a good fit, but it's not already on the trunk so I'd be > curious to know why. > > The last log4net release was in 2006 and the mailing list is pretty > quiet in terms of "getting it done" type traffic. It also seems like > over time there has been not insignificant demand for the ability to > use a different logging framework. Using something like > Common.Logging seems like a good way to solve the problems with the > client profile dependencies and the different logging framework > support. > > I don't think that replacing log4net with Common.Logging is like > trading one "evil" for another. Common.Logging has a much smaller > footprint than the actual logging frameworks and was designed to solve > the pluggable logger problem. If this is what is desired for > NHibernate, why not utilize the work of others? On top of this, there > is already a patch to implement this change in NHibernate. > > I'd very much like to have this issue pushed to completion. If it > involves additional development, testing, or documentation time, I > would be happy to volunteer my time. I just need to know where to put > my energy. > > Patrick Earl -- Fabio Maulo
