Yes Richard you are right but:
date of issue 2009/09/19 and Original estimate 168hs and 10 votes

I don't think we will see it fixed for NH3 release.

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Richard Brown (gmail) <
[email protected]> wrote:

>  Presumably there's no logging work for us to do if log4net can target the
> ClientProfile too?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-233
>
>
>  *From:* Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Monday, August 02, 2010 1:25 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [nhibernate-development] Re: Logging Abstraction
>
> The place to vote for issue fix is our JIRA
> http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2263
>
> Thanks.
>
> Here we can discuss about some "long" implementation details.
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:03 AM, David Pfeffer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I personally find the client profile support extremely important -- once
>> its available, I'll immediately begin using it. NHibernate is my only
>> dependency forcing me not to use the client profile.
>>
>>  On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Craig van Nieuwkerk 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> I think client profile will become much more important in the future.
>>> It is only just becoming used frequently with .NET 4 and I suspect
>>> most desktop applications will soon prefer it. If the work required
>>> doesn't require major rewriting I would say go for it, especially if
>>> Patrick is happy to do most of the leg work.
>>>
>>> Craig.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Patrick,
>>> > Are you sure that the client-profile-support is so fundamental ?
>>> > So far you are the only one talking about it.
>>> > Before begin a big work in NH-3 I would be sure about how much
>>> important is
>>> > the client-profile-support for NH future.
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Patrick Earl <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> For myself, I'm not particularly opinionated in any direction other
>>> >> than the direction that will allow for client profile support.  If
>>> >> this happens through a custom pluggable logging layer, common.logging,
>>> >> or some other way, I'm happy.  It seems like the common.logging
>>> >> library is a good fit, but it's not already on the trunk so I'd be
>>> >> curious to know why.
>>> >>
>>> >> The last log4net release was in 2006 and the mailing list is pretty
>>> >> quiet in terms of "getting it done" type traffic.  It also seems like
>>> >> over time there has been not insignificant demand for the ability to
>>> >> use a different logging framework.  Using something like
>>> >> Common.Logging seems like a good way to solve the problems with the
>>> >> client profile dependencies and the different logging framework
>>> >> support.
>>> >>
>>> >> I don't think that replacing log4net with Common.Logging is like
>>> >> trading one "evil" for another.  Common.Logging has a much smaller
>>> >> footprint than the actual logging frameworks and was designed to solve
>>> >> the pluggable logger problem.  If this is what is desired for
>>> >> NHibernate, why not utilize the work of others?  On top of this, there
>>> >> is already a patch to implement this change in NHibernate.
>>> >>
>>> >> I'd very much like to have this issue pushed to completion.  If it
>>> >> involves additional development, testing, or documentation time, I
>>> >> would be happy to volunteer my time.  I just need to know where to put
>>> >> my energy.
>>> >>
>>> >>        Patrick Earl
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Fabio Maulo
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Fabio Maulo
>
>


-- 
Fabio Maulo

Reply via email to