OK, this went a little bit off topic. Anyway, to get back to the subject, I was wondering whether you agree this is a crucial feature of the Linq provider. Maybe I'm missing the obvious, but I do not see a different way to get outer joins to work via Linq. I would offer to pick this up would it not be that the initial reply kind of scared me away :).
In short, can we expect to get outer joins via Linq working in the GA? On Aug 19, 9:47 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok. > > P.S. perhaps somebody will implements a fix... perhaps. > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Frans Bouma <[email protected]> wrote: > > > about this " it ends up with you talking me down in some form or the > > other" > > > I don't know what you are talking about. > > > To help you, think REALLY HARD about the following: > > Why did you reply with 3 emails to my post, only replying on my first > > sentence, as if I would imply anything with it instead of exactly what I > > said. Why did you think that of me? > > > For the record, the only one who replied with any real info to the > > topicstarter was... who? I really don't know why you had to do this, I > > really don't. > > > FB > > > > For others matter: Ok. > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Frans Bouma <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I saw that you tried to be helpful in the other part of your > > mail. > > > > I tried to be helpful in EVERY email here and on nhusers, > > and > > > I > > > didn't want to imply *anything* in the 1st sentence I wrote. WTF is > > > your > > > problem? > > > > > What we have notice is that there is a kind of "personal > > questions" > > > when > > > we > > > > are talking about our linq-provider and we don't have a > > > "personalized > > > > customer service" (at least not for free). > > > > I have no idea what you mean/refer to. > > > > > Steve is part of NH's team and the Linq provider is part of > > > NHibernate > > > core. > > > > As any other issue, even the issues related to linq-provider are > > > solved by > > > > the team. > > > > > Perhaps, with his silence, Steve and the team altogether are > > trying > > > to say > > > > the same. > > > > Sorry but I have no idea what you mean, but anyway, it's > > been > > > enough. Every f*cking time 'Linq' is mentioned and I reply in some > > > form or > > > another, it ends up with you talking me down in some form or the > > > other. I > > > just try to be helpful, but I don't need this kind of bickering. If > > > helping > > > out time after time ends up with some form of bickering, I won't > > > spend my > > > time on it anymore. Like I've said to Steve before, he can email me > > > any time > > > with questions about Linq and how to do things, but I won't reply > > to > > > linq > > > crap here again, as apparently you don't want my help/information > > > about how > > > to deal with linq expressions and what to expect. In case you don't > > > know, > > > mr. Maulo, that info is no-where to be found on the net nor in MS' > > > documentation. Only the small group on this planet who have dealt > > > with these > > > miserable issues before know what to expect and where a solution > > > 'might' be > > > found (as the only team who managed to get it all right is the Linq > > > to Sql > > > team (now abandoned) and they didn't publish any of their info). > > > > FB > > > > > P.S. I'm a "little bit" more loquacious in some cases > > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Frans Bouma <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Frans Bouma < > > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > I don't know if Steve's still reading this list, > > > > > > What do you mean ? > > > > > Well, I asked in some other linq thread a couple of > > > questions > > > > to > > > > Steve, gave info about how to do things, but never got a > > > reply (was > > > > in June > > > > or so), also all other linq related material is not > > answered > > > by him, > > > > so I > > > > wondered if he was still reading this list. I don't know > > how > > > else to > > > > interpret this remark, to be honest. > > > > > But that aside, sorry I tried to be helpful, mr. > > > Maulo. > > > > > FB > > > > > -- > > > > Fabio Maulo > > > > -- > > > Fabio Maulo > > -- > Fabio Maulo
