With "Of course" I meant that I should have thought of that myself.

I have not included the entire mapping because this is 9674 lines, the
classes are worse and I though the provided snippets were enough. Apparently
they were so I'm off to nhusers for more information.

Thank you for your help so far.

On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:

> btw, even with those few informations I can close the ticket as: Not an
> issue, wrong mapping.
> http://groups.google.com.ar/group/nhusers
> Please use the nhusers group to ask help.
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> What mean "of course" in your country ?
>>
>> Where is the attachment with mappings and classes ?
>> I can see only a mapping with a chunk of another mapping.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Pieter van Ginkel 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Of course; created NH-2351.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> JIRA ticket with, at least, mappings, classes and query to recreate the
>>>> issue.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:43 AM, pvginkel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have the following mapping with auto-quote set in the configuration:
>>>>>
>>>>>    <list name="Steps">
>>>>>      <key column="WorkflowId" />
>>>>>      <index column="Index" />
>>>>>      <one-to-many class="WorkflowStep" />
>>>>>    </list>
>>>>>
>>>>> When I access this list, the field Index is not quoted and it fails on
>>>>> the following SQL:
>>>>>
>>>>> SELECT steps0_.WorkflowId as WorkflowId1_, steps0_.Id as Id1_,
>>>>> steps0_.Index as Index1_, steps0_.Id as Id700_0_, steps0_.[Index] as
>>>>> Index2_700_0_, steps0_.StepGuid as StepGuid700_0_,
>>>>> steps0_.StepViewType as StepView4_700_0_, steps0_.WorkflowId as
>>>>> WorkflowId700_0_ FROM ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Above, the Index field appears twice, unquoted for Index1_ and quoted
>>>>> for _Index2_700_0_.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Fabio Maulo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fabio Maulo
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Fabio Maulo
>
>

Reply via email to