I'm already doing (doing mean exactly doing) some of those works where I think is the right place. - audit : talking with Simon and Roger and helping with some code - validation: working in NHibernate.Validator that has very few few things in common with Hibernate.validator - INotifyPropertyChange writing a post to demostrate how do the integration having a little performance advantage in less then 50 code lines. I'm ignoring any other possible support. - security: I have asked explication and I'm still waiting
About fork NH: I have invited people to do it more than one time, after NH3.x we will move to Hg or Git and who want can do it even more easy. To resume: I still waiting the definition of - NH "look like depends on the direction where the wind comes from" - "professional toolkit" and why NH can't be defined a "professional toolkit" already - "security" what exactly mean for NH -- Fabio Maulo El 18/10/2010, a las 10:59, Frans Bouma <[email protected]> escribió: >> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Petrov Peter <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> I think Frans Bouma has unbelievable patience. We aren't far from > the >> time when Frans will say "enough is enough" and I fear it will soon stop >> following this dev group. It will be a loss for the NHibernate project. > With >> his attitude Fabio will force back other people too. For mr. Maulo it's > time >> to reconsider his attitude toward others and his sharp tone. >> >> Perhaps you can add some opinion about the initial post of the thread >> instead try to be "the paladin of justice". >> Frans can say that he want see auditing, validation, > INotifyPropertyChanged >> and security inside NH-core and I can write my opinion and ask for >> clarifications, then the decision is not mine but of the team. > > I wrote on Thursday: > "The examples I mentioned are not things you expect on the core O/R mapper > level, however they're all services which build on top of the O/R mapper > core and utilize it, which also means that if you use NHibernate, and you > want to use the features I mentioned, you need to implement them somehow so > they utilize NHibernate." > > Google groups link: > http://groups.google.com/group/nhibernate-development/msg/e91d2b8e8bd202bd?h > l=en > > I never said it should be part of the core, as those aren't core NH > services. You have apparently no clue whatsoever I was talking about, which > explains your replies. > > Anyway, you have a narrow focus on where NH should go to, but you > don't realize that this focus only targets core O/R mapper functionality, a > problem solved years ago already, which means that there's little to nothing > to do in the future except re-inventing wheels, like we see already with yet > another xml / code based mapping system and yet another query system. > > IF I'll eventually say "Enough is enough", I'll fork NH and do what > I explained here. But that takes time and I've to look into what it brings > me, compared to the effort to invest. > > FB >
