s/VS2012/VS2010
Diego
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 13:39, Diego Mijelshon <[email protected]>wrote:
> Of course I wasn't being literal with the suicide thing... :-)
> Anyway, let's remember that switching to .NET 4.5 doesn't mean XP users
> won't be able to use NHibernate anymore. They'll just have to stick with NH
> 3.x, just like they are stuck with IE 8, VS2012 and many other pieces of
> outdated or soon-to-be-outdated software.
>
> Diego
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 13:13, Richard Birkby <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'm writing this from a corporate Windows XP machine (which was new in
>> March 2011).
>> The current plan in this corporate is to go to Win7 towards the end of
>> this year...probably after Win8/IE10 has been released.....
>>
>>
>> Richard
>> ps Yes, it's frustrating, but suicide is going a bit far
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Diego Mijelshon
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Windows XP's mainstream support ended 3 years ago, even before NH 3.0
>>> release.
>>> NH is used more in the server (for web apps) than in the PC [citation
>>> needed]
>>> XP support will be retired entirely by April 8, 2014 (less than two
>>> years from now)
>>> I'd personally kill myself if I had to work for a company that was still
>>> on XP
>>> Do you still think it's a good idea to plan the future of NH based on
>>> the practice of companies that haven't renewed their PCs since 2006?
>>>
>>> Diego
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:56, Ricardo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Windows XP is not compatible with framework 4.5. The market share of XP
>>>> is still strong in many companies.
>>>>
>>>> Do you think the new features of .net 4.5 are so important to
>>>> Nhibernate ?
>>>>
>>>> I think you could move to .NET 4.0 for next major version of
>>>> Nhibertante and abandon XP compatibility when Microsoft launch .NET 5.0.
>>>>
>>>> Ricardo
>>>>
>>>> Em domingo, 22 de abril de 2012 10h28min02s UTC-3, Fabio Maulo escreveu:
>>>>
>>>>> after use parallel
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Diego Mijelshon <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I see a couple ways to benefit from .NET 4.5:
>>>>>> - Targeting the Portable Class Library
>>>>>> - Taking advantage of (and exposing) async methods
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Both require considerable effort.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The latter can result in interesting improvements. Consider:
>>>>>> var results = await session.CreateQuery(...).List<**Foo>();
>>>>>> Internally, this could use async ADO.NET methods, so a good part of
>>>>>> the processing would not hold a thread.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Diego
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 01:14, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That mean just: "wait some more months after you have waited one
>>>>>>> year".
>>>>>>> btw,
>>>>>>> which are the specific features of .NET4.5 you are thinking about
>>>>>>> and how they may benefit NH ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Julian Maughan <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Another option to consider is skipping .NET 4, and going straight
>>>>>>>> to 4.5?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sunday, 22 April 2012 04:10:13 UTC+8, Fabio Maulo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In general after a release we have some other 2 or 3 minor
>>>>>>>>> releases (for some reason was not the case for 3.2.0).
>>>>>>>>> For vNext I'm strongly oriented to make another "big" breaking
>>>>>>>>> change... NH4.0.0 .NET4 with bye bye to Iesi.Collection, drop of some
>>>>>>>>> custom threadsafe collection to use those implemented in .NET4 ...
>>>>>>>>> NH4.1.0 drop of IDictionary for dynamic object and the usage of
>>>>>>>>> .NET4 dynamic ,
>>>>>>>>> NH4.2.0 the usage of parallel to hydrate collections after queries.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Oskar Berggren <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So what do we do now that NH 3.3.0GA is released?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There are already several interesting pull requests lined up,
>>>>>>>>>> some of
>>>>>>>>>> which are new features. I propose that the next planned version
>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>> be 3.4.0.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What about possible as yet undetected regressions in NH 3.3.0GA?
>>>>>>>>>> Do
>>>>>>>>>> you think it would be a good idea to hold of merging to the master
>>>>>>>>>> branch for a week or so in case any important regressions pops up
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> we want to do a 3.3.1? One can do this from a branch of course,
>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>> without the assistance of the excellent build server.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /Oskar
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Fabio Maulo
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Fabio Maulo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Fabio Maulo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
