2008/10/7 MAMMON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > With a lot of Entity Framework buzz being generated recently, due to > it's v1 release with VS2008 SP1, the term Persistence Ignorance has > been climbing the Google ranks ladder. Indeed, a Google search of the > term shows that of the top 5 results, 3 are about the Entity > Framework. Since I work in an otherwise all Microsoft shop, I am very > interested in the EF, and the recent buzz has caused me to think more > about Persistence Ignorance. Out of the box, EF doesn't have it, but > someone at MS has created a PI POCO adapter for EF v1. >
Please don't compare NH with EF. You can't compare 4 crazy dogs with a monster as Microsoft. Give us the same funds, or a part of it, and then we can make some comparison. BTW EF is the future because Microsoft (the word Microsoft don't need any other explication), and NH is the present. 2 weeks ago, for a new project, I have proposed LINQ2SQL in a company (yes, I have proposed LINQ2SQL) but that company said NO even if that project will work only with MSSQL. They choose NH. I don't want to talk for Ayende but... when some big OSS developer say you "write your own" or "patch it" it is because the day have only 24hours and who write code for free need help to solve all issues. Without the help of the community the OSS can't live forever. -- Fabio Maulo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
