To be honest I'm *not* actually sure. I will check that. Thanks Luis. Will also look into Castle Automatic Transaction facility.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Luis Abreu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The thing is, I don't really want to have a dependency on MSDTC, which I > believe would be the case if I used TransactionScope. After all, my > transactions aren't distributed - just nested. > > Are you sure about that? I was under the impression that it should be smart > enough whenever you have connections to the same db, but I could be > wrong... > > Luis > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
