I saw systems using NH with much more than 240 tables. Catharsis: With this question I hope somebody can understand why I'm insisting with "success story".
Phrases as: "If it is not for money it is not good" "OSS is good only for high-school projects" "ORM is slow, SP is fast" "Does NH scale in a system with 240 tables?" How many times we must demonstrate how much useful is NH each time we are involved in a new project in a new company ? The last version is NH2.0.1 (2008/09/29) and it has 48218 downloads and only 20 or 30 "success story" ? 2009/3/4 Thomas Koch <[email protected]> > > Hi - we have a legacy web application which is to be ported to use > NHibernate 2.0. > > My question is whether or not some you have any experience with using > NHibernate on a web-application with approx. 240 tables? The 240 > tables is including both many-to-many tables and entity tables. > > Does it scale? Can I expect the initial load time to explode to 20 > minutes or what? > > Cheers, > Thomas > > > -- Fabio Maulo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
