Hi Fabio - I fully agree with you that succes stories are important. I already find NHibernate to be very useful - I simply needed some assurance/input/experience with regard to initial load times etc. :-)
Thomas On 4 Mar., 14:29, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > I saw systems using NH with much more than 240 tables. > Catharsis: > With this question I hope somebody can understand why I'm insisting with > "success story". > > Phrases as: > "If it is not for money it is not good" > "OSS is good only for high-school projects" > "ORM is slow, SP is fast" > "Does NH scale in a system with 240 tables?" > > How many times we must demonstrate how much useful is NH each time we are > involved in a new project in a new company ? > > The last version is NH2.0.1 (2008/09/29) and it has 48218 downloads and only > 20 or 30 "success story" ? > > 2009/3/4 Thomas Koch <[email protected]> > > > > > Hi - we have a legacy web application which is to be ported to use > > NHibernate 2.0. > > > My question is whether or not some you have any experience with using > > NHibernate on a web-application with approx. 240 tables? The 240 > > tables is including both many-to-many tables and entity tables. > > > Does it scale? Can I expect the initial load time to explode to 20 > > minutes or what? > > > Cheers, > > Thomas > > -- > Fabio Maulo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
