I've tried mapping one end as inverse, it still results in the collection being loaded. To be clear, I want to add to the collection *without loading it* as the collection is large. The only way I have found that works is to introduce the mapping table as a class in the model, making both ends of the many-to-many inverse and explicitly saving the mapping table class.
This is an ugly hack that I thought experienced NHibernate users might have a solution for. On Feb 23, 12:49 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > http://nhforge.org/doc/nh/en/index.html#collections-bidirectional > > 2010/2/23 Jonathan Curtis <[email protected]> > > > > > Here are my mappings (which do not work): > > > EntityOne: > > > <bag cascade="all" name="EntityTwos" table="EntityOneToEntityTwo"> > > <key> > > <column name="EntityOneId" /> > > </key> > > <many-to-many class="NHibernateTest.EntityTwo, NHibernateTest, > > Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null"> > > <column name="EntityTwoId" /> > > </many-to-many> > > </bag> > > > EntityTwo: > > > <bag cascade="all" name="EntityOnes" table="EntityOneToEntityTwo"> > > <key> > > <column name="EntityTwoId" /> > > </key> > > <many-to-many class="NHibernateTest.EntityOne, NHibernateTest, > > Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null"> > > <column name="EntityOneId" /> > > </many-to-many> > > </bag> > > > Is this enough information? > > > On Feb 23, 3:06 am, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have a problem doing this > > > myEntity.OtherStuff.Remove(myOtherStuff) > > > I don't like NH behaviour when I execute that code. > > > Can you help me ? > > > > 2010/2/22 Jonathan Curtis <[email protected]> > > > > > I don't see how it is an abstract problem, I'm not doing anything > > > > special. I'm just asking what mappings I should use that will enable > > > > me to add to a many-to-many collection without that collection being > > > > loaded: > > > > > myEntity.OtherEntities.Add(myOtherEntity); > > > > > It seems like this should be a common scenario. I appreciate the help. > > > > I've tried various mapping, but all load up the collection. Is this > > > > possible? > > > > > On Feb 22, 11:38 pm, John Davidson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Fabiois saying that dealing with an abstract problem is not going to > > find > > > > a > > > > > resolution, either positive or negative. If you have a proff-of > > concept > > > > show > > > > > the mappings used to the group, so that they can better help you. > > > > > > John Davidson > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Jonathan Curtis < > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Can you elaborate? > > > > > > > On Feb 22, 10:59 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > mappings > > > > > > > > 2010/2/22 Jonathan Curtis <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > We have a entity with a many-to-many collection mapped as a > > lazy > > > > > > > > loaded bag. When we load up the entity, the collection is not > > > > loaded - > > > > > > > > great. Now we want to add a new entity to that collection. As > > soon > > > > as > > > > > > > > we do this, the collection is loaded up. > > > > > > > > > How do we add the new entity without loading up the whole > > > > collection > > > > > > > > (the collection is large)? > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > Google > > > > > > Groups > > > > > > > > "nhusers" group. > > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > > > > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]> > > <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]> > > > > > <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]> > > <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]> > > > > > > > <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]> > > <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]> > > > > > <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]> > > <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Fabio Maulo > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > Groups > > > > > > "nhusers" group. > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]> > > <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]> > > > > > <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]> > > <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]> > > > > > > > . > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en. > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups > > > > "nhusers" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]> > > <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]> > > > > > . > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en. > > > > -- > > > Fabio Maulo > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "nhusers" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en. > > -- > Fabio Maulo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
