I just don't like to do things by halves.
The Wiki was just updated. :-)

On 16 Aug., 16:59, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
> WOW!! all that work for 2 classes ?
>
> Thanks.
> P.S. if you add the link, with an example, in nh-forge wiki would be useful.
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:44 AM, mgernand
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi all,
>
> > I finished the Common.Logging 2.0 HNibernate Log Provider.
> > I made it public under the LGPL License. The source or binaries
> > may be downloaded at: nhlogging.codeplex.com
>
> > Kind regards, Matthias
>
> > On 9 Aug., 18:16, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > where you want.
> > > because are few lines you can use the How-to wiki
> > ofwww.nhforge.orghttp://nhforge.org/wikis/howtonh/default.aspx
>
> > > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 1:13 PM, mgernand <
> > [email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > Hi Fabio,
>
> > > > this part:
> > > > <appSettings>
> > > >  <add key="nhibernate-logger" value="Your assembly qualified name of
> > > > your LoggerFactory"/>
> > > > </appSettings>
> > > > was the "NHibernate.config configuration subsystem" I meant. You
> > > > know..naming things... ;-)
>
> > > > But okay, I now agree to the solution and it's implementation.
> > > > The adapter implementation for common.logging is no big problem.
> > > > I think I'll start it tomorrow and make it public the next days.
> > > > Where sould I publish it best?
>
> > > > On 9 Aug., 12:06, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > You can join to the discussion in dev-list.... but it is something
> > late.
> > > > > Btw..
> > > > > - we have removed a dependency instead substitute
> > > > > - 90% of NH-users does not have to deploy common.logging and
> > > > > common.logging.log4net and does not need to configure something else
> > > > "only
> > > > > because 3% of users want NLog".
> > > > > - the "NHibernate.config configuration subsystem" you are talking
> > about
> > > > does
> > > > > not exists for logging, it exists for Common.Logging.
> > > > > If you need an alternative logging-system what you have to do is:
> > > > >   <appSettings>
> > > > >     <add key="nhibernate-logger" value="Your assembly qualified name
> > of
> > > > your
> > > > > ILoggerFactory"/>
> > > > >   </appSettings>
> > > > > that is all.
> > > > > For 90% that does not have problem with log4net the configuration is:
>
> > > > > Yes... is nothing, they only need to deploy log4net.dll as they are
> > doing
> > > > > today.
>
> > > > > If you want, you can implements an adapter to use common.logging in
> > NH
> > > > then
> > > > > you can make it public and make happy some NH's users.
>
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, mgernand
> > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > > > Hi,
>
> > > > > > recently I updated the trunk-Version and noticed the introduction
> > of
> > > > > > a new File "Logging.cs" where the logging Interface is located. Now
> > > > > > I am a bit surprised that a homegrown logging abstraction is
> > created
> > > > > > instead of using the Common.Logging 2.0 infrastructure, where alle
> > > > > > the abstraction work was already done. Now I need to implement a
> > > > > > custom ILoggerFactory (f.e. NLogLoggerFactory) just because one
> > > > > > wanted to use the NHibernate.config configuration subsystem?
>
> > > > > > Whst is the backgound of this - in my opinion - questionable design
> > > > > > decision? I would have loved to see the integration of
> > Common.Logging
> > > > > > 2.0 into NHibernate because we are using it all over our projects.
>
> > > > > > Kind regards, Matthias
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > Groups
> > > > > > "nhusers" group.
> > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> > <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
>
> > > > <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> > <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
>
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > Fabio Maulo
>
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > > "nhusers" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> > <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
>
> > > > .
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
> > > --
> > > Fabio Maulo
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "nhusers" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
> --
> Fabio Maulo

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to