> The same way you do; I'm selling a software (vertical solution, that makes
> the difference) and it is using NHibernate. (2.x version) I don't want to
be
> rude with you, but you get the answer you deserve.
a little odd, don't you think, considering I was asking a normal
question?
> For some reasons (reasons you know yourself as software provider), you can
> provide as much documentation and tutorials, webcasts, blog entries on the
> subject, people will always ask the same questions.
>
> I'm reading this list on a daily basis, and I can't count the "how to
handle
> sessions", "why is the save or update not working".
> Yet, everyday, they (the "wind" team ;-)) they keep on answering kindly.
>
> I must recognize that it took me some time to understand Fabio sense of
> humor, but I've never read a meaningless answer from him.
>
> Frankly speaking, even if I know a lot of people in my industry, if they
one
> day enter my support forum giving me lesson on the way I should managed my
> product, I would probably kick them out and be pissed off.
> Ego based reaction ? Yes.
I didn't gave a lesson, I asked a question, because I wondered about
it for some time now. The reason I asked is because for me to provide a
solid layer on top of NH for what my work does is difficult besides the
persistence part: all other stuff is scattered around in a dozen projects
with various quality, docs, etc. while all of it is in fact only usable with
NH, so IMHO it's better for users of NH if the 'package' NH simply brings
everything you need to the table: persistence _and_ entity services.
To be honest, I don't see why that's a) giving a lesson how to run
things and b) such an awful question to ask.
> And here..Well...It is OSS man. You think something needs to be done ?
> Then contribute ! Do it for the community. Give some free time to build an
> information blog.
I don't see why NH being OSS has anything to do with it: if the team
decides these 50 features have to be implemented, then if someone asks 'how
can I contribute?' it's the same as with mono: look at the list of stuff to
be done and implement it, document it, etc.
IMHO a more efficient way of getting things done, also with OSS.
> I have no bad feeling and I have a great respect for your knowledge and
your
> job. But obviously, you ask a question that would be relevant on the LLBL
> user forum (and agree that you have a real product management) but it is
> quite pointless here.
On the contrary, I don't see how asking about why NH isn't going
into a more defined direction on my own forums is getting the answers I'm
looking for.
But again, if asking these kind of questions is reason to bash me or
my post or whatever, wtf is wrong then as I don't get it.
FB
>
> Regards,
>
> Fred.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
