Simon has ported most of Envers. Right now I'm sitting writing tests for it. Many written tests pass, some don't.
I would say it will take some time before an alpha release is official. The link you sent I don't know anything about. The work Simon started and I currently help him with is part of NH Contrib source. /Roger ________________________________________ Från: [email protected] [[email protected]] för alexey_baranov [[email protected]] Skickat: den 17 oktober 2010 14:52 Till: nhusers Ämne: [nhusers] Re: Changing to Audit Model This is very interesting. What is the current state of NHibernate Envers? Google search mute this project. All I see is http://code.google.com/p/nenverse/ with very low of information. Thanks! On Oct 17, 12:33 am, Gunnar Liljas <[email protected]> wrote: > You may be interested in following the progress of NHibernate Envers, > which could be just what you need. Or could perhaps possibly need in > the future.... Investigate it enough to make an informed choice, but > don't build more than you need.. > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Diego Mijelshon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I'm building a nuclear reactor now, but I might want to turn it into a > > spaceship later for some reason... > > > Diego > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:02, Tim Hoolihan - @thoolihan > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Our team has a project using NHibernate in a pretty normal DDD > >> fashion. Using repository pattern, service layer (not web services). > >> There has been discussion that the product owners may want to change > >> to an audit model later, where they can see each change. > > >> It's currently unclear how they would want to see this, and how > >> often. It may be we can simply log all changes out via an audit > >> listener and not change much. > > >> But the requirements may lead us to thinking we should move the > >> database to an audit model (by which I mean, updates are really > >> inserts with a newer timestamp, and select defaults to the latest > >> version). > > >> Which leads to my question / investigation: > > >> We could hand write this in via the repository, or try to get fancy > >> with IInterceptor. But I wanted to check first, are there any > >> libraries in the community that assist with this kind of thing? I'm > >> thinking of how Burrow implements conversations, but for audit- > >> friendly databases. > > >> Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks. > > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> "nhusers" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> [email protected]. > >> For more options, visit this group at > >>http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "nhusers" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
