Diego,
There's no need for this kind of sarcasm.  This is not a frequently
asked question, and I've done my homework and read the docs.

And I'm not "thinking about a spaceship later", I'm trying to
determine if there is a reasonable migration model in the likely event
of additional requirements coming into the project.  And these are
requirements that have been brought up multiple times by the business
user.

I understand under-researched questions can make people in the
community jaded, but if you're this jaded maybe you need to take a
break from answering questions.  I answer questions over on stack
overflow all the time, and if I don't like a question, I simply move
on.
-Tim

On Oct 16, 12:46 pm, Diego Mijelshon <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm building a nuclear reactor now, but I might want to turn it into a
> spaceship later for some reason...
>
>     Diego
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:02, Tim Hoolihan - @thoolihan <
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > Our team has a project using NHibernate in a pretty normal DDD
> > fashion. Using repository pattern, service layer (not web services).
> > There has been discussion that the product owners may want to change
> > to an audit model later, where they can see each change.
>
> > It's currently unclear how they would want to see this, and how
> > often.  It may be we can simply log all changes out via an audit
> > listener and not change much.
>
> > But the requirements may lead us to thinking we should move the
> > database to an audit model (by which I mean, updates are really
> > inserts with a newer timestamp, and select defaults to the latest
> > version).
>
> > Which leads to my question / investigation:
>
> > We could hand write this in via the repository, or try to get fancy
> > with IInterceptor.  But I wanted to check first, are there any
> > libraries in the community that assist with this kind of thing?  I'm
> > thinking of how Burrow implements conversations, but for audit-
> > friendly databases.
>
> > Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "nhusers" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected] 
> > >
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to