perhaps you are looking to wrong events.
Which are exactly your needs ? (try to explain it from the usage point of
view and not what you think is the right behavior of NH).

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:20 PM, j gwood <[email protected]> wrote:

> I ran some additional tests:
>
> 1) If I create and associate new Parent, Child, and Grandchild objects
> and call ISession.Persist(Parent), the PersistEventListener only gets
> fired for the Parent entity.  The SaveOrUpdate events get fired for
> the Child and Grandchild entities.  The PreInsert event gets fired for
> all three entities (Parent, Child, and Grandchild).
>
> 2) Using the "Merge" test in the original post (i.e., selecting an
> existing Parent entity that contains existing Child and Grandchild
> entities; then adding a new/transient Grandchild entity), I called
> ISession.Persist instead of ISession.Merge.  The PersistEventListener
> only gets fired for the Parent entity.  The SaveOrUpdate event gets
> fired for the Child and Grandchild entities.  The PreInsert event gets
> fired for the Grandchild entity.  The PreUpdate event gets fired for
> the Child entity.
>
>
> On Apr 22, 11:57 am, j gwood <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Our Repository exposes a Save(entity) method, which calls either
> > SaveOrUpdate (for transient entities) or Merge (for persisted
> > entities).  We call Merge to handle detached entities.
> >
> > The Persist event listeners only get called from the
> > SessionImpl.Persist or SessionImpl.PersistOnFlush methods.  Should we
> > substitute our SaveOrUpdate or Merge calls with Persist?
> >
> > Or, is there any documentation on when and how often the different
> > Event Listeners get called?
> >
> > Thanks so much for your help,
> >
> > Jean
> >
> > On Apr 22, 7:39 am, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > The Save/SaveOrUpdate is not so deterministic as you need. Probably
> > > you are looking for Persist.
> >
> > > --
> > > Fabio Maulo
> >
> > > El 21/04/2011, a las 13:50, j gwood <[email protected]>
> escribió:
> >
> > > > I have the following hierarchy of entities:
> >
> > > > Parent
> > > > Child
> > > > Grandchild
> >
> > > > The Parent entity contains a property for the Child entity.  The
> Child
> > > > entity contains a property for the Grandchild entity.  Each
> > > > relationship is a one-to-one relationship that is mapped in
> > > > the .hbm.xml file using one-to-many in order to use the cascade
> > > > option, all-delete-orphan (see NH-1262
> http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-1262).
> >
> > > > I am using both a MergeEventListener and a SaveOrUpdateEventListener
> > > > to get notified when the Grandchild entity is saved so I can perform
> > > > logic in case the Grandchild is saved due to a cascade from Parent or
> > > > Child.  I check the Version property of the Grandchild entity to
> > > > perform certain logic based on whether or not the entity is transient
> > > > or persisted.
> >
> > > > In the following scenario, the SaveOrUpdate (or Merge) events are not
> > > > being fired for the Grandchild entity until after the entity has been
> > > > "persisted" or had its Version number changed from 0 to 1:
> >
> > > > - Select an existing Parent from the database that contains a Child
> > > > and Grandchild.
> > > > - Create a new/transient Grandchild object and add it to the
> > > > Parent.Child.Grandchild property.
> > > > - Merge (or SaveOrUpdate) the Parent entity.
> >
> > > >    using (ISession session = this.OpenSession())
> > > >    {
> > > >        using (ITransaction transaction = session.BeginTransaction())
> > > >        {
> > > >            Parent startingParent =
> > > > session.Get<Parent>(this.ExpectedParentId);
> >
> > > >            Grandchild closedGrandchild = new Grandchild {StatusValue
> > > > = "Closed"};
> > > >            startingParent.Child.Grandchild = closedGrandchild;
> >
> > > >            Parent actualParent =
> > > > (Parent)session.Merge(startingParent);
> >
> > > >            transaction.Commit();
> > > >        }
> > > >    }
> >
> > > > When session.Merge or session.SaveOrUpdate are called, the
> > > > MergeEventListener (or SaveOrUpdateEventListener) for the Parent
> > > > entity gets fired, but no other events are fired at this time.
> > > > However, when the SaveOrUpdateEventListener is finally fired for the
> > > > Child and Grandchild entities during transaction.Commit(), the
> > > > Grandchild.Version property is already set to 1 (i.e., persisted).
> > > > The Version was updated during the Merge of the Parent entity when
> the
> > > > merge/save was cascaded down to the Grandchild entity:
> >
> > > > [Class=NHibernate.Engine.CascadingAction]:  cascading to merge:
> > > > NHibernate.Test.NHSpecificTest.NHEvents470.Grandchild
> > > > [Class=NHibernate.Engine.VersionValue]:  unsaved-value: 0
> > > > [Class=NHibernate.Event.Default.AbstractSaveEventListener]:
>  transient
> > > > instance of: NHibernate.Test.NHSpecificTest.NHEvents470.Grandchild
> > > > [Class=NHibernate.Event.Default.DefaultMergeEventListener]:  merging
> > > > transient instance
> > > > [Class=NHibernate.Event.Default.AbstractSaveEventListener]:
>  generated
> > > > identifier: beb25e35-45cd-4093-b88e-9b166c5ca7f0, using strategy:
> > > > NHibernate.Id.Assigned
> > > > [Class=NHibernate.Event.Default.AbstractSaveEventListener]:  saving
> > > >
> [NHibernate.Test.NHSpecificTest.NHEvents470.Grandchild#beb25e35-45cd-4093-
> > > > b88e-9b166c5ca7f0]
> > > > [Class=NHibernate.Engine.VersionValue]:  unsaved-value: 0
> > > > [Class=NHibernate.Engine.Versioning]:  Seeding: 1
> >
> > > > The behavior is similar for SaveOrUpdate as the Grandchild.Version
> > > > property gets incremented to 1 before the SaveOrUpdateEventListener
> is
> > > > called.
> >
> > > > Is this the expected behavior of NHibernate?  I would've expected the
> > > > MergeEventListener or SaveOrUpdateEventListener to get called when
> > > > each "child" entity is being saved on the cascades at the same time
> as
> > > > the "parent" object is being saved instead of seeing the events fired
> > > > for the "child" entities during transaction.Commit().
> >
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "nhusers" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> > > > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
Fabio Maulo

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to