Thanks Ricardo. Op vrijdag 25 mei 2012 17:26:19 UTC+2 schreef Ricardo Peres het volgende: > > Peter, > > AFAIK, union-subclass corresponds to the Table Per Concrete Class/Concrete > Table Inheritance ( > http://martinfowler.com/eaaCatalog/concreteTableInheritance.html) pattern, > which, as it name implies, only needs tables for the actual concrete > classes. So, I assume it was a mistake. > > RP > > On Friday, May 25, 2012 11:05:36 AM UTC+1, Peter wrote: >> >> In this post <http://ayende.com/blog/3941/nhibernate-mapping-inheritance>, >> Ayende explains an approach for inheritance using union-subclass. I noticed >> in the mapping, he added a 'table' attribute to his abstract Party class >> mapping. In the image below it, where he shows the database schema, there >> is no such table however. >> >> So, when using union-subclass, where your base class doesn't map to a >> separate table, is specifying the table necessary? Or will NHibernate just >> ignore whatever you specify? >> >> I posted this on >> StackOverflow<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10739714/do-you-have-to-specify-the-table-for-an-abstract-and-table-less-baseclass-when-u/10739958#10739958>, >> >> but we now chose a different approach. If nobody answers the question, I >> might just remove it from SO, but I'm still curious for the answer. >> >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/nhusers/-/94k_tyqAS-AJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
