Hi  Mauricio, posted here
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/altnet-hispano/9REUVpyyRM0



2012/12/23 Mauricio Scheffer <[email protected]>:
> Hi Elio,
>
> You posted a question concretely about NHibernate's health in a NHibernate
> forum, so somehow your concern was about NHibernate. I'm really curious
> about what made you think that NHibernate specifically was dead.
>
> About those other projects, I can only speak about Castle (never cared much
> for the others): The ohloh statistics for Castle (
> https://www.ohloh.net/p/castleproject ) are based on *all* Castle projects,
> so they're skewed. Most of them are really dead. The ones that are still
> actively maintained are Core, DynamicProxy, Windsor, Transactions and the
> NHibernate facility. Monorail was pretty much absorbed by ASP.NET MVC.
> ActiveRecord was rendered largely obsolete by FluentNHibernate and later
> advancements in code-based configuration in NHibernate and things like
> SharpArchitecture.
> Also, many people, myself included, just don't need IoC containers any more.
> I dropped many of the libraries/frameworks I used to use because they're
> simply not worth their complexity.
> Still, if you're missing any features in LinFu or Spring, you should post to
> their respective mailing lists, get involved in their development. As I
> usually say, open source is the ultimate do-it-yourself: if you need
> something, go ahead and implement it. Never wait around for it to magically
> happen.
>
> Cheers,
> Mauricio
>
>
> On Sunday, December 23, 2012 6:55:21 PM UTC-3, Elio Batista wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mauricio, thanks for your response, as developer i agree with you
>> in your point.
>> My main concern actually come from Ohloh's analysis. I was curios
>> cause i noticed that projects  like Castle, LinkFu,
>> Spring.NET are virtually idle.
>>
>> 2012/12/23 Mauricio Scheffer <[email protected]>:
>> > IMHO, less activity in a project does not imply its death. I have open
>> > source projects that I hardly touched for over a year and they work in
>> > production as usual, without issues. I don't touch them simply because
>> > they
>> > already do whatever I need them to do (and this apparently also applies
>> > to
>> > their users). Sure there's always ideas for cool new features and room
>> > for
>> > improvements (sometimes we're even tempted to rewrite the whole thing),
>> > but
>> > this takes time and effort. Time that can be used to (for example)
>> > deliver
>> > actual business value.
>> >
>> > Compare to your workplace. At least where I work, there's quite a few
>> > systems in production. Some of them don't get any changes in months,
>> > which
>> > is actually a good thing, because it means they're doing what they're
>> > supposed to do, which means that programmers can focus on changes that
>> > are
>> > strategically important or deliver immediate business value. Not
>> > everything
>> > has to change all the time.
>> >
>> > About NHibernate in particular, Ohloh's analysis (
>> > https://www.ohloh.net/p/nhibernate ) says that it has stable
>> > year-over-year
>> > commits, so it's objectively not true that its activity is decreasing.
>> > The
>> > last commit was seven days ago. Last release: two months ago. Also take
>> > a
>> > look at the graph of contributors per month. There's quite a bit of
>> > activity
>> > in this google group and in Stackoverflow. The NHibernate JIRA (
>> > https://nhibernate.jira.com/browse/NH ) shows many issues resolved in
>> > the
>> > last month and a lot of activity in the last few days.
>> >
>> > May I ask what metrics or criteria you are using that led you to think
>> > that
>> > NHibernate is dead?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Mauricio
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups
>> > "nhusers" group.
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit
>> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/nhusers/-/brAeHDr5NsEJ.
>> >
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/nhusers/-/e6wTbjAf4aMJ.
>
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to