Without getting into the NHibernate questions directly, I believe it is
critical to point out that maintaining “old ways” has severe limitations and
is a major inhibitor of being able to make the best use of modern
facilities. I have seen this cause severe problems over the 40+ years I have
been involved in software development.

 

Using new approaches opens up new vistas, and makes practical things that
were only theoretical discussions even a few years before.

 

Since the question is about a new project, I suggest a forward looking
approach. Which approach is most likely to be the basis for a roadmap that
will be applicable over the next 3-5 years (or even longer depending on
project scope)?

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Fred
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2012 4:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nhusers] Is NHibernate dead?

 

As far as I'm concerned, I'm using NHibernate in all my projects involving a
SGBD and the 1.2 (that means since 2007). Due to my job (running a company,
serving my clients,etc…) I don't have much time to participate.

 

However your question seems to me a bit useless (My english is not perfect /
I don't mean to be rude)

 

The question  of storing objects into SGBD has been solved 10 years ago with
Java and NHibernate (as a port) has been doing it for over 6 years.

 

I know that every developer like the fancy stuff (lambda, fluent…) and hype
coding-ways, but stability is a key when providing technology.

 

If you look at EF, nothing you learn with V1 applies to V5, it is a constant
re-invention of the framework - Yet on a very fast release sequence

If you look ad NHibernate, everything I learned does still apply, and my
(old) user judgement today is that you cannot invent content : what would
you expect in other releases ?

 

I would more likely trust a framework that has evolved according to its
underlying technology (.net) and yet perhaps slowing down because it's
mature, than choosing a framework because it is Ms stamped with 4 different
rewrite in the timeline.

 

Most of people wants to choose the framework for fallacious reason (linq,
lambda), and when using ORM they will continuously ask the same questions
(slow performances on huge graph, distribution / wcf)…

 

Good luck for your project,

 

AND MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL !

F.

 

Le 23 déc. 2012 à 16:59, Elio Batista <[email protected]> a écrit :





Hi, we are about to estart a new project,big one, and we have to choose
between NHibernate and EF. I am a huge fan of NHibernate so i'm inclined to
use it but as i see the NHibernate development has slowed down to a point
that i'm concerned of his future and the impact of development in this new
project.

What you people think about this?

Thanks

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/nhusers/-/MIquQY4oPCsJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to