I for one am not trying to back anyone into a corner, but I have some honest 
questions, and if it doesn't hurt would like to have some answers so I can 
learn.  I appreciate Dennis Hammerl vast product knowledge and helpful 
contributions.  But something just seems wrong with .0011 Dia. jets, .011 is 
eleven thousandths and that doesn't jibe with .0011...  I would never wrap 
piano wire around anyones neck, not even yours... LOL.

--- On Sun, 5/31/09, jjrobert <[email protected]> wrote:


From: jjrobert <[email protected]>
Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 700SC carbs question
To: "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" <[email protected]>
Date: Sunday, May 31, 2009, 5:36 AM



Folks...don't back him into a corner...there are other uses for piano
wire, after all :-)

On May 30, 11:51 pm, Dennis Hammerl <[email protected]> wrote:
> Have you ever seen a factory shop manual ? Just wondering. They must be wrong 
> on all those specs. My piano guy has two smaller sizes than what I use. I 
> guess he's wrong too.
>
> --- On Sat, 5/30/09, Mark Hasslinger <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Mark Hasslinger <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 700SC carbs question
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Saturday, May 30, 2009, 8:49 PM
>
> also the standard tolerance on pin gages is 0002"  (that's two tenths of an 
> inch) the tolerance can be applied on the plus side or the minus side.
>  
> An eleven thousandths diameter pin gage on the plus tolerance would be from 
> .0110" to.0112"  or a maximun size of eleven thousandths and two tenths.
>  
> An eleven thousandths diameter pin gage on the minus tolerance would be 
> from.0110" to .0108" or a minimum size of ten-thousandths and eight tenths.
>  
> music wire tolerance are another story but this should clear up the confusion.
>
> --- On Fri, 5/29/09, Dennis Hammerl <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Dennis Hammerl <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 700SC carbs question
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Friday, May 29, 2009, 9:12 PM
>
> The actuall size of the hole in a slow jet (#38) is .0011" That's eleven ten 
> thousands of an inch. No typo.
>
> --- On Fri, 5/29/09, Mark Hasslinger <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Mark Hasslinger <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 700SC carbs question
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Friday, May 29, 2009, 9:32 AM
>
> That's .011 wire.
>  
> "a .0011 wire"  would not allow gas to pass.
>  
> Is this a typo or are you really mistakenly looking for this wire in a set 
> wire?  If you have a wire set look again,maybe.
>
> --- On Fri, 5/29/09, Dennis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Dennis <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 700SC carbs question
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Friday, May 29, 2009, 1:18 AM
>
> I didn't pass a .0011 wire through the slow jets - didn't have one.  
>  
> Recall, this problem came on rather suddenly; one day it was running the way 
> it had for a year and the next I wondered if I would be able to make it home 
> because is had so little power.   I'm not sure if that's significant but it 
> seems like it should eliminate some things.
>  
> When it runs, there's no popping of backfiring and anything.  It's regular - 
> just very weak.   I'll open the screws on each float-bowl and confirm there's 
> have fuel tomorrow.
>  
> Dennis
> - Seattle
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dennis Hammerl
> Sent: 28 May, 2009 21:29
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 700SC carbs question
>
> That's scary stuff... flash point is too low. You could be hurt.
> After a few minutes of run time, shut it of and open those screws a bit (the 
> one you sent a picture of) and see if fuel runs out. this way we insure that 
> each bowl is filling. I'm assuming that you passed the .0011 wire through 
> each slow jet ? I'm starting with some basic stuff here. Does this pop or 
> anything? just sounds flat ? 
>
> --- On Thu, 5/28/09, Dennis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Dennis <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 700SC carbs question
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009, 11:51 PM
>
> Dennis,
>  
> It is very flat seeming when it runs.   I haven't run it long enough to let 
> it fully warm up.  But, during the time I have run it, I use about half choke 
> and a bit of throttle to keep it running or else the RPMs drop so low it 
> stops.   When I've got it going and I give it throttle, it comes up slowly 
> and with little enthuiasm.   I've run it up to about 3500 and it sounds 
> pretty different than it would if it were run up to 3500 when it is running 
> right.
>  
> I have some spray starter fluid - would that do?
>  
> Dennis
> - Seattle
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dennis Hammerl
> Sent: 28 May, 2009 20:39
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 700SC carbs question
>
> Your plugs are indicating a lean condition.(ideal is somewhat brown)  Not 
> unexpected given being loose. Loose plugs do not transfer heat as they 
> should. Effectively rendering them about one heat range more than they should 
> be. It would appear that they all were firing. However, I will wait to see 
> what you have to say about that. A 700s running on two out of four would be a 
> very flat sounding, poor running thing. Do you have a spray carb cleaner ? 
> Idle the motor and push the boots aside a tiny bit and spray a bit into each 
> carb throat and observe the reaction. If it picks up or garfs a bit.
>
> --- On Thu, 5/28/09, Dennis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Dennis <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 700SC carbs question
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009, 11:17 PM
>
> Dennis,
>  
> Thanks as always for sharing your advice.   Tommorrow, I'll see which plug 
> wires are sparking.
>  
> I did use the strong light method of evaluating the butterfly valves and the 
> one I adjusted was a better match when I was finished.
>  
> I wondered if taking the cables off at the grips was the right thing to do to 
> gain extra length.   I didn't do it that way and it was a very tight business 
> to do it the other way but, ultimately, it worked.   Next time, I'll take the 
> cables loose on the other end and make things easier.
>  
> I just walked out and had another look and now I see where to connect the 
> manometers.   Does make a lot more sense than trying to connect them to the 
> bottom of the float-bowls, eh <smile>?
> Dennis
> - Seattle
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: 28 May, 2009 19:53
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 700SC carbs question
>
> The OEM exhaust is a balanced affair. So dismiss any thought of a diagnosis 
> in that fashion. Please do check for spark at all plugs before we go tearing 
> into anything else. When you have determined that, get back to me. The 
> procedure to check out an ignition issue on a system like that is something 
> that will take time to write out. Only if I have to.
>
> The vacuum take-off point is at the screws on the intakes. Same place as the 
> vacuum take-off that is used for the petcock. The hoses are plugged into 
> adapters on one, three and four, the petcock take-off on two. Understand ? 
> You have to remove the screws and thread in adapters.
>
> Did you use a strong light to determine that a throttle plate needed to be 
> moved ?
>
> Graham, the "pressed in jet" is not to be removed. There are only two. 
> Remember to clear the slow speed jets with the .0011" wire.
>
> As far as R&R of the carb pack, it is best to start at the grip
>  and remove the cables to insure enough slack at the carbs. The air box can 
> be slid back quite far to allow space, just takes some effort. Liquid soap, 
> WD-40, or silicone spray makes for a much easier time popping the boots and 
> intakes off and on. Kyle takes the bolts out and pulls the intake manifolds 
> out with the pack. I have no problem with that method.
>
> --- On Thu, 5/28/09, Graham Rogers <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Graham Rogers <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 700SC carbs question
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009, 10:17 PM
>
> I haven't put the carbs back on my 700SC yet - I'm afraid to!  I put the 
> carbs back on my CB750F and it ran like before! Graham
>
> On May 28, 2009, at 9:28 PM, Dennis wrote:
>
> Well, I finished putting my 700SC back together today and started it up - and 
> it ran just as before.   It feels like I have two cylinders firing and two 
> not - but that's a guess - I haven't watched the spark plugs spark to prove 
> it.  I have the stock dual exhaust and it seems to me like both mufflers feel 
> the same.  So for either muffler, one cylinder's hitting and one's missing.  
> Does that make sense?
> Dennis, I'm keen to focus now on the coils if you still think that's the most 
> likly target to investigate,  Can you tell me your thoughts again about how 
> to test them out?   I had a look at them today but I didn't see anything 
> obvious like broken or shorted wires.
> Cheers!
> Dennis Gallagher
> - Seattle
> - '85 & '86 CB700SC


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to