I'm thinking that's what the McMaster spec sheets have done. Still...
be nice to have a compression modulus, too. Though I can probably
derive that from the ILD/PSI spec...

-Kurt

On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:31 PM, David Cummings
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I think you're on track. And yes,I would concur that sample size would
> change things from here: http://www.pfa.org/jifsg/jifsgs4.html
> "It is also necessary to report the entire sample size. Sample size,
> in addition to thickness, can drastically influence IFD readings."
>
> But you could just convert to PSI and have a uniform measure across
> the board, right?
>
> -Dave
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Kurt Nolte <[email protected]> wrote:
>> So... if I have a PSI (25%) deflection value of, say, 4... that would
>> be a minimum ILD of 96 (4 pounds/square inch * 24 square inch minimum
>> sample size), if I'm understanding correctly?
>>
>> The Foambymail quote seems to be saying they use a big foot (50 in^2)
>> on a possibly much smaller sample (24 in^2); it would seem that ILD
>> would thus depend on the sample size...
>>
>> -Kurt
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:21 AM, David Cummings
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> From the foambymail website:
>>>
>>>  ILD: Indentation Load Deflection - A measure of the load-bearing
>>> capacity of foam. ILD is generally measured as the force (in pounds)
>>> required to compress a 50 square-inch circular indentor foot into a
>>> 4-inch thick foam sample no smaller than 24-inches square to a stated
>>> percentage of the foam's initial height. Common ILD values are
>>> generated at 75% of initial height.
>>>
>>> -Dave
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Kurt Nolte <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> That's just it, man. I'm reading through McMaster's spec sheets for
>>>> their closed cell polyethylene foam. The densities seem to cap out at
>>>> 5 (with 2.3 and lower being more common) and a "PSI (% deflection)"
>>>> spec instead of an ILD. I get a tensile strength, and occasionally a
>>>> stretch limit range, but no compression modulus... I'm rather
>>>> disappointed, this time around.
>>>>
>>>> I've used McMaster numerous times before, usually I get a lot more of
>>>> the info I need than I am this time.
>>>>
>>>> -Kurt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Allen Thomas <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Mcmaster carr sells practically everythin including any foam you could
>>>>> want and the have spec charts to help you figure out what you want if
>>>>> you don't know.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/1/10, Joey Kelley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> I'm with Kyle on that one....
>>>>>>         I had mine redone by a local guy, trying to start a name for
>>>>>> himself in the upholstery business - it looks less like a 80s Honda
>>>>>> seat now, more like an ATV, but I actually prefer it, looks cleaner.
>>>>>>         -Joey
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Kyle Munz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> Um, that's way over my "cut up the couch and steal the foam" level. :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Kyle
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Kurt Nolte <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, let me bounce some stuff off you guys, since the specs listed on
>>>>>>>> the DIYmotorcycleseat.com site don't seem to be standard with the
>>>>>>>> suppliers I'm looking at.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Since neither of my foam inserts are really in any decent shape to put
>>>>>>>> back on the bike (lots of dry rotting and cracking), I'm looking to
>>>>>>>> use one of them as a basic shape guide and just making something new.
>>>>>>>> DIYms suggests a high density polyethylene closed cell foam as a base
>>>>>>>> layer, but I'm not finding much info on the ILD and compression
>>>>>>>> modulus specs on supplier websites.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I do have specs for "PSI (% deflection)" which seems to be how much
>>>>>>>> PSI (usually 4-9) it takes to hit (usually 25%) a certain compression.
>>>>>>>> I don't know if this is comparable to ILD; anyone here know? Anyone
>>>>>>>> here a materials engineer?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>> -Kurt
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.

Reply via email to