I'm using a D3 (never used any DX) so 200mm lens for portrait is long for 
sure but not that unmanageable.  In fact, a lot of people (particularly 
Chinese and Taiwanese) posted to the web their gorgeous portrait pics 
taken with AF-s 200/2.

The reason why I'm interested in the 200/2 is because of it's excellent PQ 
and boken on one hand, and on the other hand I lack a good tele above 85mm 
(I have AF-s 17-35/2.8, AF-s 24-70/2.8, AI-s 50/1.2 and AI-s 85/1.4).  I 
may use the 200/2 as portrait (well, I know it's looooooong) and, together 
with a TC17II, as an all-purpose tele lens.

BTW, anyone use it handheld (with its VR) with good result?  And am I the 
only one who find its hood (HK-31) funny?


---------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:29:15 -0400
From: Nikon List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Nikon] Nikon Digest, Vol 41, Issue 3
To: [email protected]

Well, I don't think it would be bad, but not good either, or easy.

I used to use a 135 MM all the time for portraits.  I tended to like 
80 MM for that work (both Nikon film and Hasselblad) and then bought 
the super fine AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.4D IF and it was all over.  I bought 
that lens, went to a political event and used it 20 minutes later on 
an F5, and fell in love.  It is a money maker.  I continued to use 
that lens after I got my D-1, then D-1x, then D-3.  I really like the 
way the images look, even though I need to get closer with the D-3, 
like the old days with the F-5s.

Even though the 200 MM may look great, I think the working distance 
with a full frame camera is gong to be WAY too long, and if you are 
using a DX sensor, you are going to need a very large studio.

If you want a sharp lens, you could also consider the AF DC-Nikkor 105 
MM f/2D or the AF DC-Nikkor 135mm f/2D.  I don't suggest them for 
their defocus control, but for their sharpness.  I THINK I would go 
for the 105, but maybe not.

As I wrote above, for decades I liked the 135 MM, but the working 
distance was a bit long, so I got closer.

I cannot see using anything shorter than 80 MM though.  People like 
there noses to look smaller! <g>

********************************************************* 
SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT! 
********************************************************* 

HKPC - Your Partner in Productivity 
For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hkpc.org 

Disclaimer: 
The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be 
privileged and confidential and intended for the exclusive use of the 
addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,reproduction, 
distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the 
sender by return e-mail and remove it and all copies from your system. Internet 
communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely, secure, error or virus-free. 
The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://nikonusers.com/pipermail/nikon_nikonusers.com/attachments/20090623/d1195663/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Nikon mailing list
[email protected]
http://nikonusers.com/mailman/listinfo/nikon_nikonusers.com

Reply via email to